Miftah Wangsadanureja
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) ZAD, Cianjur, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Paylater Mindset: The Shift in Gen Z's Thinking Towards Debt from a Sharia Perspective Rizaldy Alpiansyah; Isrun Abdurahman; Irfan Alkhotiri; Miftah Wangsadanureja; Dzulfikri
Dirham : Journal of Islamic Economics Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Dirham : Journal of Islamic Economics
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Minhajul Haq

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66891/3a26sp98

Abstract

Digital disruption in the modern economic landscape has given birth to financial technology (fintech) instruments that radically change the consumption patterns and financial governance of society globally and nationally. One of the most dominating innovations that has sparked sharp discourse is the Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) service, more popularly known as paylater. Generation Z (Gen Z) and Millennials are recorded as the largest demographic of users in this service ecosystem, where the total outstanding paylater debt in Indonesia reached an aggregate figure of Rp29.59 trillion in April 2025, with a Non-Performing Loan (NPL) ratio that continues to creep up. This scientific report presents a comprehensive, in-depth, and nuanced analysis of the fundamental shift in Generation Z's mindset towards the concept of debt due to paylater penetration, evaluated strictly through the lens of Islamic economics, Fiqh Muamalah, and Maqashid Sharia. Through a synthesis of empirical data from the Financial Services Authority (OJK), behavioral economics literature, and fatwas from the National Sharia Board of the Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI), this research identifies an acute sociological shift: debt, which in Islamic tradition is inherently viewed as an emergency instrument based on mutual assistance (tabarru'), is now commodified into a lifestyle based on instant gratification and a "self-reward" culture that reduces the psychological friction of shopping (pain of paying). Furthermore, the analysis in this report outlines contemporary Fiqh Muamalah resolutions regarding the schemes of Istijrar, Murabahah, Wakalah bil Ujrah, Qardh, and Kafalah to strictly differentiate between conventional paylater and sharia paylater facilities. Within the framework of Maqashid Sharia, the normalization of consumptive debt among Gen Z is proven to be diametrically opposed to the principle of Hifz al-Mal (protection of wealth), triggering systemic threats in the form of israf (extravagance) and tabzir (extreme wastefulness). In conclusion, the report asserts that without structured, massive, and digitally integrated Islamic financial literacy interventions, the ease of access to instant credit can transform from a tool of financial inclusion into a trap of long-term financial fragility that undermines the economic resilience of future generations.
Wahabisme: Istilah Yang Dibangun Untuk Membendung Dakwah Tauhid (Analisis Historis, Teologis, Dan Sosiopolitik) Isrun Abdurahman; Rizaldy Alpiansyah; Irfan Alkhotiri; Miftah Wangsadanureja; Tatang Hidayat
Bahrul Ilmi : Journal of Islamic Religious Education Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Bahrul Ilmi: Journal of Islamic Religious Education
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Minhajul Haq

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66891/cyhmem75

Abstract

The landscape of Islamic thought and world history is inseparable from the emergence of various religious reform and purification movements responding to moral decadence, intellectual stagnation, and theological deviations. One of the most disruptive phenomena to the global socio-political order since the 18th century is the dawah movement pioneered by Sheikh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab in the Arabian Peninsula. This movement, which essentially aims to restore the purity of Tawhid (absolute monotheism) and eradicate practices of shirk and bid'ah, has historically become more globally recognized by the term "Wahhabism." This research report comprehensively and deeply examines how the term "Wahhabism" is not actually an identity self-constructed by the followers of the movement—who internally prefer the terms Muwahhidun (proponents of Tawhid) or Salafiyyun—but rather a political and pejorative label produced and reproduced by external entities. Through qualitative library research analyzing primary and secondary literature, this report traces the genealogy of the term from its initial emergence in internal polemical works, its massive adoption by the Ottoman Empire's propaganda machine, its semantic expansion by Orientalists and Western colonial authorities (British and Dutch), to its socio-political implications in the Indonesian Archipelago from the Padri War to the contemporary era. Analysis shows that this labeling is an instrument of discursive hegemony and epistemological violence intentionally constructed to delegitimize, alienate, and stem the spread of the Tawhid dawah, which was perceived as a threat to the political stability of traditional empires, Western colonial dominance in the Middle East and South Asia, and syncretic cultural orders in various Muslim regions. Furthermore, this report presents a critical review of the modern commodification of this term as a tool of stigmatization that divides the social integration of the Muslim Ummah.