Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WLRev
Asri Wijayanti
Faculty of Law, Muhammadiyah University Surabaya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Eksistensi Dewan Pengupahan Dalam Proses Penetapan UpahMinimum Anas Santoso; Asri Wijayanti
Wijayakusuma Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Wijayakusuma Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51921/haahay54

Abstract

An existence of Wage Council in the process of setting minimum wages is currently less than optimal. Thisresearch aimed to analyze the existence of Wage Councils in the process of setting minimum wages based on ananalysis of substance and procedures in legislation. This research was a normative juridical with statuteapproach. The results showed that the differences in the implementation of the provisions of Article 88paragraph (4) of Law 13/2003 with the implementing regulations contained in Article 43 paragraph (1) PP78/2015 jo Keppres 107/2004 jo Article 1 Permenaker 15/2018. The resulting recommendation made a revisionof the rule of law that can optimize the Wage Council's performance in the process of setting minimum wages. 
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Atas Alat Pelindung Diri Fitri Hardianti Solicha; Asri Wijayanti
Wijayakusuma Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Wijayakusuma Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51921/af41a146

Abstract

Every worker must get a guarantee for occupational safety and health while carrying out the work relationship.This research aimed to find out the form of legal protection for workers for their personal protection devices andlegal remedies. This research was a normative juridical with statute approach. The first research result showedthat every worker was guaranteed their right to occupational safety and health integrated with the company'smanagement system. Employers were required to provide explanations and self-protective equipment to workerswho were obliged to use them. There was a threat of criminal sanctions for violating entrepreneurs. The secondresearch result showed a civil law effort. It can be done by workers if they do not get an explanation and personalprotective equipment that can conduct bipartite deliberation or mediation and continue to the PHI for the harmcaused. Criminal legal remedies can be undertaken by workers by reporting K3 violations to local labor inspectoremployees. It was concluded that the employer had the obligation to provide an explanation and self-protectiveequipment. The workers were entitled and obliged to use self-protective equipment. There were criminalsanctions for employers who violated but there were not criminal sanctions for workers who violate. Theresulting recommendations were the sanctions for workers.
Eksistensi Alat Bukti Formal Dalam Perselisihan HubunganIndustrial Hasan Al Munir; Asri Wijayanti
Wijayakusuma Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Wijayakusuma Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51921/1ckyjp80

Abstract

Formal evidence in industrial relations disputes is very important in fact the parties (workers) are unable toprovide sufficient formal evidence during the process of resolving industrial relations. The purpose of thisresearch found out the substance of legal subjects and legal objects of formal evidence in the process of resolvingindustrial relations disputes. This legal research was a normative juridical with a statute approach. The resultsshowed the substance of formal evidence in industrial relations disputes, consisting of the substance of the legalsubject and the legal object of the evidence. formal evidence in disputes over industrial relations was veryimportant to achieve truth. The resulting recommendations were that special arrangements that needed to bemade to require employers / laborers to provide evidence of industrial relations they carried out.
Co-Authors Anas Santoso Fitri Hardianti Solicha Hasan Al Munir