Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of International Relations Diponegoro
Ika Riswanti Putranti
Jurusan Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
9. Dilema Hak Asasi Manusia Di Asia Tenggara: Ketiadaan Peran Asean dalam Kasus Perekrutan Tentara Anak di Myanmar dalam Perspektif English School Alvian Rizky H; Ika Riswanti Putranti; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 1, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i1.14589

Abstract

ASEAN as a regional organization of Southeast Asia is considered absent and did notcontribute in the case of child soldiers’ recruitment in Myanmar. ASEAN, which hashuman rights commission such as the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on HumanRights (AICHR) and the ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and Protection of theRights of Women and Children (ACWC), has failed in promoting the protection of humanrights and child rights in the case of child soldiers in Myanmar. The absence of ASEAN iscontradictory to the actions taken by UN, Human Rights Watch (HRW), Child SoldierInternational (CSI) and neighboring countries in preventing and stopping the recruitmentof child soldiers in Myanmar. This research is aimed to analyze the reason behind suchsituation. Based on the view of pluralist international society, the absence of ASEAN inchild soldiers’ case in Myanmar is caused by two main reasons. First, non-interferenceprinciple which is upheld by ASEAN to respect the sovereignty of Myanmar. Second,inability to reach consensus within ASEAN, while consensus itself is decision makingprinciple in ASEAN aimed to avoid any action which may compromise the sovereignty ofother member states. On the other hand, the opposite responses given by UN, NGOs andneighboring country of Myanmar can be viewed by solidarist international society, whichargued that such actions are forms of protection of the values of individual freedom andhuman rights.
6. Serangan Israel terhadap Kapal Bantuan Kemanusiaan Mavi Marmara Tahun 2010 Antonius Pramudya Adityas; Ika Riswanti Putranti; Fendy Eko Wahyudi
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 1, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i1.14585

Abstract

Israel and Palestine are two countries involved in protracted and restless conflicts. In 2010,the pro-Palestinian movement named Gaza Freedom Flotilla Organization was going tosend humanitarian aid to Gaza by the sea. Amid the trip, one of the ships in the Gazahumanitarian aid group Freedom Flotilla named Mavi Marmara was attacked by IsraelDefense Forces. The purpose of this study is to explain the reason of Israeli attack on MaviMarmara aid ship. The research question will be analyzed by theory of securitization toexplain the reason of why Israel attacked the humanitarian aid ship Mavi Marmara. Troughthe securitization theory, it will be explained on how a state responses a nonpolitical issueand alters it into a political issue that requires an effective policy. This research usesexplanatory method to understand the reason behind the attack on Mavi Marmara. Thediscussion in this study is based on Israel’s point of view. The result of this research is thatthe attack on the Mavi Marmara aid ship was a defense strategy by the Israeli Governmentin order to tackle the possible threats to dismiss Israeli’s Blockade to Gaza as part of it’sprotection policy.
12. Kerja Sama Indonesia-UNCTAD dalam Implementasi Competition Law and Policy di Indonesia Periode 2004-2007 Dwi Priyatno; Reni Windiani; Ika Riswanti Putranti
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 1, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i1.14595

Abstract

The monetary crisis that hit Indonesia in 1997 caused by various factors, one of the mainfactor was the practice of concentration of economic power that tend to for a monopolisticmarket. Thus, impacting the fragility of its economic resilience. In order to accelerate theeconomic growth after the monetary crisis, Indonesia had received financial assistancefrom the IMF, with the requirement that Indonesia had to restructure its economic systemas they agreed in the letter of intent. The letter of intent contains a point that Indonesiashall implement the competition law and policy to prevent the concentration of economicpower activities in Indonesia such as monopoly, cartel and bid rigging. In the process of itsimplementation, Indonesia had received assistance by UNCTAD to operate capacitybuilding for stakeholders. This research uses a perspective by neoliberal institutionalist toanalyze capacity building cooperation that conducted by Indonesia and UNCTAD. Thisresearch is descriptive analytic and also used qualitative as its research method. Theconclusion showed that cooperation by Indonesia and UNCTAD are based on rationality,which both sides took the benefit as they desired.
Co-Authors Alvian Rizky H Antonius Pramudya Adityas Dwi Priyatno Fendy Eko Wahyudi Mohamad Rosyidin Reni Windiani