Ika Riswanti Putranti
Departemen Hubungan Internasional Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Reinterpretasi Pasal 9 Konstitusi 1947 Jepang: Potensi Ancaman dalam Komitmen Jepang Pada War on Terror Damartyas Murti Wredhanto; Ika Riswanti Putranti
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 4, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i4.21883

Abstract

International Security issue has been a huge concern to Japan under the administration of Shinzo Abe. After the demilitarization of the Japan by the United States and the allies on World War II, Japan can only rely on the United States military base in Okinawa, and some other kind of police to protect themselves. Japan's intend to strengthen its military capacity and power was outlawed due to Article 9 of the Japanese 1947 Constitution that restricts Japan to use any form of military power to solve any kind of dispute that taken place on their territory. The Constitution was made by the United States and the allies as the victorious side of the World War II to disarm all of Japan's military capacity and power. With that constitution (especially Article 9), Japan was changing from an expansionist-imperialist into a peaceful country that uses any form of negotiation to solve any kind of dispute that they've faced. But on 2014, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his administration unveils that reinterpretation of the Article 9 is happening and being discussed at the parliament to allow Japan's Self Defense Force (JSDF) (for the first time) helps the allies if they needed some, to support War on Terror propaganda by the United States.
Analisis Pengaruh Host Country terhadap Perusahaan Multinasional: Skandal “Dieselgate” Volkswagen Group di Amerika Serikat Yoga Alghazi Ahmad; Ika Riswanti Putranti
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 4, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i4.21890

Abstract

Bargaining position is an important part in the dynamics of relations between actors in international relations. Bargaining position can be regarded as a connecting bridge for a party to show leverage and to reach the intended outcome or interest. In the case of the "dieselgate" scandal in the United States, it appears the nuances of the more dominant leverage of the United States as Host Country against the Volkswagen Group as a multinational corporation (MNC) in settling the case. The United States is a home and host for several multinational corporations (MNCs) that are engaged in the automotive industry. The big names like General Motors and Ford became representations of the power of the automotive industry in the United States. The position of the United States as a country with mature political and economic conditions, is a distinct advantage for the United States. Coupled with the conditions as mentioned, it certainly creates a special attraction for several Multinational Corporations (MNCs) in this industry to develop their business activities in the United States, not least for the Volkswagen Group.
KERJA SAMA BILATERAL INDONESIA DAN HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MENGENAI STOLEN ASSET RECOVERY : STUDI KASUS BANK CENTURY Samudra Ginting; Ika Riswanti Putranti; Fendy Eko Wahyudi
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i4.17844

Abstract

This research aims to explain the obstacles to implementation of Century Bank's asset recovery in the Hong Kong jurisdiction. Asset recovery efforts from Hong Kong Jurisdiction has been undertaken by the Government of Indonesia through bilateral agreements on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters. However, the efforts have some obstacles from 2009 to 2016 , so that the asset has not been returned successfully. This research uses compliance theory with rationalism approach from realist tradition. Then the method used in this researh is qualitative, with the kind of exploratory research through interview data collection techniques and literature. The result of this researh is Hong Kong has not complied to the content of agreement. This non-compliance is related to the rational act of Hong Kong government. In addition, the rational choice of Hong Kong is keeping the principle of financial confidential.