Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Konsep Dasar Teori Hukum serta Pendekatan dalam Filsafat dan Teori Hukum Agus Munandar
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI 2026
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/e4w92p03

Abstract

Law plays an important role in regulating social life in order to create order, justice, and legal certainty. To understand the function and purpose of law comprehensively, it is necessary to study legal theory and philosophy of law. This research aims to explain the basic concepts of legal theory and examine various approaches in the philosophy and theory of law. The research method used is normative legal research with conceptual, philosophical, and historical approaches. Data were collected through library research using various literature sources, such as books, journals, and the opinions of legal scholars. The results of this study indicate that legal theory is a field that discusses the basic concepts of law, legal norms, sources of law, and legal principles that form the foundation for the implementation of law in society. Meanwhile, the philosophy of law focuses on moral values, justice, and the purpose of law. Various approaches in the philosophy of law, such as normative, analytical, social, historical, and philosophical approaches, provide different perspectives regarding the nature and application of law. These approaches complement one another in developing a legal system that is fair, responsive, and in accordance with societal development. Therefore, an understanding of legal theory and philosophy of law is essential in developing a legal system that not only emphasizes legal certainty but also upholds the values of justice and humanity.
Peran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Digital dalam Menghadapi Hoaks dan Disinformasi di Era Media Sosial Agus Munandar; Muhammad Japar; Raharjo Raharjo
CARONG: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): April-Juni, Ilmu Sosial dan IPA
Publisher : Universitas Serambi Mekkah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/6yratf27

Abstract

The development of social media has created an open digital communication space while simultaneously increasing the spread of hoaxes and disinformation that potentially threaten social integration, democratic stability, and the quality of citizens’ participation. This study aims to analyze the role of digital citizenship education in strengthening society’s resilience against false information (hoaxes) in the era of social media. The study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method by analyzing various national and international journals, academic books, and relevant scientific documents. The findings indicate that digital citizenship education plays a strategic role in enhancing digital literacy, critical thinking skills, digital communication ethics, and citizens’ responsibility within the virtual public sphere. The study also reveals that the low culture of information verification and the high consumption of instant information are the main factors contributing to the increasing spread of disinformation on social media. The novelty of this research lies in the development of a conceptual model of digital citizenship education based on civic resilience, which integrates digital literacy, digital ethics, and digital citizen participation as preventive measures against hoaxes. In conclusion, digital citizenship education functions not only as an instrument of democratic education but also as a mechanism for strengthening the social resilience of digital society against disinformation
Etika Politik dalam Bayang-Bayang Pragmatisme: Studi Kasus Koalisi “Gemuk” dan Dampaknya Terhadap Fungsi Oposisi Agus Munandar; Mohammad Maiwan; Irene Camelyn Sinaga
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/fm814n39

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of oversized coalitions in Indonesia’s multiparty political system and their implications for the function of opposition in democracy. The main focus of this research is to analyze how political pragmatism influences the formation of broad governing coalitions and its impact on political ethics and the quality of democracy. The phenomenon of oversized coalitions reflects the tendency of political parties to prioritize strategic interests and access to power over ideological consistency and political ethical principles. This research employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through library research and documentation from various sources, including books, scientific journals, reports from international institutions, and relevant political documents. The analysis was conducted by examining the relationship between political pragmatism, the formation of oversized coalitions, the weakening of opposition, and the decline in democratic quality. The findings indicate that oversized coalitions are capable of creating political stability and strengthening governmental effectiveness in the short term. However, on the other hand, such conditions weaken the function of opposition as a mechanism of checks and balances. The dominance of large coalitions reduces oversight of the government, decreases the quality of political competition, and increases tendencies toward party cartelization and elite political consolidation. This phenomenon also contributes to democratic backsliding, characterized by declining accountability, transparency, and the quality of public deliberation in democracy. This study concludes that oversized coalitions are not merely a matter of political strategy, but also an issue of political ethics that affects the sustainability of democracy. Therefore, strengthening the role of opposition, revitalizing political ethics, and reinforcing mechanisms of power oversight are necessary to ensure that democracy functions substantively rather than merely procedurally..