Udaya Madjid
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of the Political Party Financial Assistance Policy at the Central Executive Board of the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) Fitron Fajrurizkie; Udaya Madjid; Haikal Ali
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID) Vol. 5 No. 05 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), May 2026
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Referring to the Audit Report (LHP) of the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK RI) for the 2022 Fiscal Year, it is stated that almost all political parties at the national, provincial, and regency/city levels in Indonesia exhibit the same issue, namely the inadequate implementation of financial assistance policies. This means that the management, accountability, and utilization of political party financial assistance have not been carried out in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. This study employed a qualitative research method with a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and documentation. The informants in this study were the Director of Domestic Politics of the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Head of the Sub-Directorate for the Facilitation of Political Party Institutions, the Secretary General of the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS), the General Treasurer of the Central Executive Board (DPP) of PKS, the Financial Staff of the DPP PKS, and the BPK Audit Team. The results of this study indicate that: The implementation of the policy regarding the use of political party financial assistance, in terms of communication, resources (human resources and budget), bureaucratic structure, and disposition within the Central Executive Board of the Prosperous Justice Party, has not been effective and has not adequately supported the implementation of the use of political party financial assistance. Supporting factors include: (a) the availability of a legal framework regulating procedures for reporting accountability in the use of political party financial assistance; (b) the availability of sanctions; (c) the existence of a political party financial assistance audit team; (d) the availability of advanced technology; and (e) support from community elements incorporated in Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). Meanwhile, the inhibiting factors include: (a) the absence of clear percentage allocations for the use of political party financial assistance; (b) the absence of a special government institution specifically tasked with supervising, guiding, and socializing political parties; (c) the low quality and quantity of human resources; (d) the lengthy chain in the distribution of financial assistance; and (e) the financial assistance provided by the government to political parties is considered insufficient and inadequate.
Evaluation of Internal Control over Recurring Audit Findings of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs Yosef Gilbert Parhula Aruan; Udaya Madjid; Rusmiyati Rusmiyati
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID) Vol. 5 No. 07 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 2026
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The achievement of public accountability in government institutions depends on the effective implementation of the Government Internal Control System (SPIP). Institutionally, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) has attained SPIP Maturity Level 3; however, recurring audit findings continue to be identified. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the internal control system in addressing recurring findings, identify the inhibiting factors based on the five dimensions of the COSO framework, and formulate tactical recommendations to overcome these challenges. This descriptive qualitative study employed a case study approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with key informants representing both auditors (the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs) and auditees (the Directorate General of Village Government Development, the Regional Representative Council, the Institute of Public Administration Jatinangor Campus, and the Institute of Public Administration North Sulawesi Regional Campus), as well as through document analysis of the Audit Reports for the 2021–2024 period obtained from the SIWASIAT application. Data were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña interactive analysis model. Using the five dimensions of the COSO framework as the analytical basis, the study identified five cross-dimensional and thematic inhibiting factors: weak organizational commitment and control culture; inadequate supervisory planning documents in determining the focus of recurring findings; regulatory weaknesses and the absence of enforceable institutional sanctions; limitations in supervisory information systems and technology; and weaknesses in monitoring methodology, along with a compliance-oriented approach to follow-up verification. The findings indicate that the current internal control system remains insufficient to break the cycle of recurring audit findings. Therefore, the study recommends strengthening leadership commitment through behavioral regulations, formalizing operational risk registers, enhancing the SIWASIAT early warning system, standardizing Root Cause Analysis (RCA) training for auditors, and implementing a two-step follow-up verification mechanism.