Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan
Iwan Bambang
Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Tenggarong, Indonesia
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Ethical Guidelines for the Use of AI in Students’ Assignments, Research, and Academic Writing Barthomius K. Jiu; Iwan Bambang
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v5i5.501

Abstract

This article examines the ethics of using generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) in student assignments, research, and academic writing. The study was designed as a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the logic of PRISMA 2020. The review synthesizes official policy documents and peer-reviewed studies published primarily between 2023 and 2025, a period during which Gen AI became a major issue in higher education. The findings indicate that Gen AI should neither be treated as an absolute threat nor as a substitute for academic reasoning. Ethically acceptable use lies in transparent, limited, and accountable assistance, such as idea mapping, language refinement, conceptual clarification, and feedback support, while core academic responsibilities must remain under human control. The main ethical risks include plagiarism through concealment, fabricated references, hallucinated facts, privacy breaches, authorship confusion, deskilling, and inequality caused by unequal access and varying levels of AI literacy. This article argues that ethical governance in higher education should shift from a prohibition paradigm toward a guided and responsible-use paradigm grounded in honesty, verification, authorship accountability, pedagogical alignment, and institutional disclosure. The study also proposes a practical framework for universities and lecturers to classify permitted, restricted, and prohibited uses of Gen AI in academic work.
Co-Authors Barthomius K. Jiu