Dono Darsono
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Dilema Diskusi di Era Digital, Ruang Publik atau Arena Konflik: (Analisis Habermas dalam Kasus Amsal Sitepu Pada Platform X) Siti Patimah; Irfan Haniful Qoyyim; Feggy Nurdiansyah; Dono Darsono
AN-NASHIHA Journal of Broadcasting and Islamic Communication Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): April : Jurnal AN-Nashiha Journal of Broadcasting and Islamic Communcation Stud
Publisher : Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/an-nashiha.v6i1.2916

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the phenomenon of digital discourse on platform X in the Amsal Sitepu case through the lens of Jürgen Habermas's Public Sphere theory. The criminalization of videographer Amsal Sitepu triggered massive debates that blurred the boundaries between rational-critical dialogue and emotional conflict arenas in cyberspace. Using a descriptive qualitative method and a critical discourse analysis approach, this study explores how platform X functions as a contemporary public sphere. The results show that although digital platforms are often trapped in opinion fragmentation, particularism, and affective conflict, the Amsal Sitepu case proves the existence of emancipatory potential through the "communicative power" of civil society. Organized public opinion pressure on social media proved capable of demanding institutional accountability and correcting the dominance of administrative power. This study concludes that social media can become an effective public sphere if the established discourse is able to transform from mere sentiment into logical and measured arguments.
Rezim Kebenaran dan Kuasa Negara: Analisis Wacana Kritis atas Kontroversi Kuota Haji Khalid Basalamah Ikmal Maulana Akbar; Dzulfikar Adirais; Dono Darsono
AN-NASHIHA Journal of Broadcasting and Islamic Communication Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): April : Jurnal AN-Nashiha Journal of Broadcasting and Islamic Communcation Stud
Publisher : Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/an-nashiha.v6i1.3292

Abstract

This article analyzes the 2024 Hajj quota controversy involving Khalid Basalamah through the lens of Michel Foucault's theory of truth regimes. Using a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach, this study demonstrates how the state, bureaucracy, and digital media collectively produce "social truths" that do not always align with legal facts. Key findings demonstrate three discursive mechanisms at work: procedural normalization by the state bureaucracy, the production of social stigma through digital media framing, and the struggle for moral legitimacy in the public sphere. This case demonstrates that the Hajj pilgrimage has become a political-administrative arena where power operates subtly but effectively to shape public perception.