Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Analysis Of the Criminal Offense of Hajj Quota Trading from the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law Putri Adzanni; Yayan Muhammad Royani; M. Yusuf Azazy
Hikmah Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): Januari-Juni 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sumatera Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53802/hikmah.v23i1.642

Abstract

This study was motivated by the emergence of the practice of buying and selling Hajj quotas in Indonesia, which has the potential to undermine fairness in the national waiting list system and conflicts with provisions of positive law and Islamic legal values. This study aims to analyze the criminal act of buying and selling Hajj quotas based on Articles 116 and 123 of Law No. 8 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Hajj and Umrah and to examine it from the perspective of Islamic criminal law. The study employs a normative legal approach using a descriptive-analytical method through legislative and comparative approaches. Data was obtained through a literature review of legislation, court decisions, legal literature, and relevant sources of Islamic law. The results of the study indicate that the practice of buying and selling Hajj quotas is a prohibited act and is subject to criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment or a fine in accordance with statutory provisions. From the perspective of Islamic criminal law, this act can be categorized as a jarīmah ta’zir because it involves the acquisition of unlawful profit, the abuse of trust, and the potential to infringe upon the rights of the community. This study concludes that both positive law and Islamic law consistently prohibit the practice of buying and selling Hajj quotas to ensure justice, social order, and the public interest.
Reconstructing Maintenance Rights for Children Born of Rape: Beyond Nasab Doctrine toward State Responsibility Budi Tresnayadi; Jajang Jamaluddin; Yayan Muhammad Royani; Khairani Dewi
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v11i2.16890

Abstract

Children born of rape face persistent uncertainty regarding long-term maintenance because Indonesian law separates child protection, criminal restitution, and family-based maintenance. While positive law emphasizes restitution and compensation, Islamic family law traditionally associates paternal maintenance with legally recognized nasab, creating a protection gap when paternal lineage cannot be established or enforced. This study examines the limitations of the nasab-based maintenance doctrine and formulates a maqāṣid-based model of responsibility for children born of rape. It employs doctrinal legal research using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and maqashid al-shari‘ah approaches. Legal materials include Indonesian legislation, court decisions, classical Islamic jurisprudence, and scholarly studies on children’s rights, lineage, and victim protection. The findings demonstrate that existing restitution mechanisms do not ensure continuous maintenance, while the dependence of maintenance on nasab may leave affected children without an effective responsible party. A purposive interpretation of hifz al-nafs, hifz al-nasl, and hifz al-mal supports treating maintenance as an independent child-protection entitlement rather than merely a consequence of legal lineage. This study proposes a layered responsibility model in which the perpetrator or proven biological father bears primary liability, while the state serves as a subsidiary guarantor when private responsibility cannot be identified or enforced. The model requires a state-managed child maintenance guarantee, periodic judicial assessment, and a right of recourse against the perpetrator. This reconstruction aligns Islamic legal reasoning with the best interests of the child and provides a sustainable framework for protecting children born of rape.
Sanksi Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Slot) Dalam Kuhp Pasal 303 Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Hasbi Shiddiq El-Islamy; Yusup Azazy; Yayan Muhammad Royani
Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): September
Publisher : IAI Darussalam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30739/darussalam.v18i1.5383

Abstract

Pesatnya perkembangan teknologi internet melahirkan modus perjudian baru di Indonesia yang dikenal dengan judi online slot, yang mudah diakses dan telah menjaring berbagai kalangan masyarakat, mulai dari pelajar hingga ibu rumah tangga dan aparatur negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan menelusuri kronologi kasus perjudian online di Indonesia, mengkaji unsur-unsur tindak pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 303 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) ditinjau dari sudut pandang hukum pidana Islam, serta menganalisis efektivitas sanksi yang dijatuhkan terhadap perbuatan tersebut dari kedua perspektif hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan-undangan, konseptualisasi, dan kasus, bersumber pada data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui kajian kepustakaan dan dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa operasi penegakan hukum terbaru terhadap sindikat judi online menampilkan pola berulang berupa operasi berbasis agregator dan aliran dana lintas negara; bahwa mekanisme teknis Random Number Generator (RNG) menjadi bukti penentu bahwa hasil setiap putaran sepenuhnya bergantung pada peruntungan, bukan keterampilan, sehingga memperkuat pemenuhannya unsur "peruntungan belaka" dalam Pasal 303 KUHP sekaligus unsur gharar dalam hukum pidana Islam; serta bahwa penegakan Pasal 303 KUHP, meskipun signifikan secara kuantitas dalam menekan pemutaran dana judi online, masih belum sepenuhnya efektif akibat kendala yang didapat, teknologi, dan opasitas algoritma. Dalam perspektif hukum pidana Islam, judi online slot digolongkan sebagai jarimah ta'zir yang bersifat fleksibel dan preventif sehingga memberikan wawasan berharga bagi penguatan kebijakan nasional. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengintegrasian penegakan hukum represif dengan pendekatan preventif berbasis edukasi dan transparansi algoritma.
Legal Analysis of the Criminal Act of Counterfeiting Halal Food Products under Articles 56 and 57 of the Law on the Guarantee of Halal Products, in Accordance with Islamic Criminal Law Irwan Sunardi; Yayan Muhammad Royani; Yusup Azazy
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam Vol 7, No 2 (2026): Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58836/al-qanun.v7i2.30670

Abstract

The falsification of halal-certified products demonstrates that legal protection cannot rely solely on the halal certification system but also depends on the effectiveness of post-certification supervision and law enforcement. Previous studies have primarily focused on the implementation of halal certification, consumer protection, or fraudulent practices in Islamic criminal law separately, while analyses of the legal construction of criminal offenses under Articles 56 and 57 of Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Assurance (Halal Product Assurance Law) and the evaluation of their penal policy from the perspective of Islamic criminal law remain limited. This study aims to analyze the legal construction of the criminal offense of halal product falsification, examine its conformity with the concept of jarimah takzir, and evaluate the relevance of the criminal sanctions stipulated in the Halal Product Assurance Law. This normative legal research employs statutory and conceptual approaches using library research, with legal materials analyzed through descriptive-analytical methods. The findings indicate that halal product falsification constitutes a lex specialis criminal offense whose legal elements are established through the unlawful use of halal certificates or labels and the failure to maintain the halal integrity of certified products. Such conduct corresponds to the concepts of ghisy  (fraudulent deception) and tadlīs (misrepresentation) and is classified as jarimah takzir under Islamic criminal law. The novelty of this research lies in conceptualizing halal product falsification as a regulatory crime and evaluating Indonesia's penal policy through the four objectives of takzir: retribution, restoration, special prevention, and general prevention. The study concludes that the sanctions provided under the Halal Product Assurance Law are substantively consistent with the principles of takzir but require strengthening through victim-oriented restoration, business actor rehabilitation, and preventive enforcement mechanisms to enhance legal protection for muslim consumers.