Ariangga Ramadhansyah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE URGENCY OF DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION IN MAINTAINING SOCIAL SECURITY STABILITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE PROPHETIC HADITH: (A Thematic Study of Selected Hadiths from al-Kutub al-Sittah Using a Contextual Commentary Approach) Ariangga Ramadhansyah; Budi Ichwayudi; Fairuz Zakirah
Al-Majaalis : Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah Vol 13 No 2 (2026): AL-MAJAALIS : JURNAL DIRASAT ISLAMIYAH
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Dirasat Islamiyah Imam Syafi'i Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37397/al-majaalis.v13i2.1427

Abstract

This study analyzes the urgency of drug abuse prevention in maintaining social security stability from the perspective of the Prophet's Hadith. Conventional legalistic and biomedical approaches, while necessary, have proven insufficient to address the moral and social dimensions of the phenomenon, leaving a significant gap in normative-religious analyses grounded directly in the prophetic tradition. To fill this gap, the present study employs a qualitative library-research design with descriptive analysis of secondary data, applying Syarḥ al-Ḥadīth al-Siyāqī (Contextual Hadith Commentary) as articulated by Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwī integrating textual, historical, and contemporary dimensions to five selected hadiths from al-Kutub al-Sittah. The findings demonstrate that these five hadiths jointly articulate a comprehensive prevention paradigm in which drug abuse constitutes a tangible manifestation of ḍarar threatening the foundations of social life. The prohibition of muskir wa mufattir grounds the protection of intellect; lā ḍarar wa lā ḍirār establishes a universal ethical prohibition against self- and social destruction; the hadith on yu'manu sharruh articulates social security as relational morality; the prohibition of self-destruction frames drug abuse as intihār baṭīʾ (slow suicide); and kullukum rāʿin distributes preventive accountability across every social stratum. Together, these hadiths operationalize the maqāṣid of ḥifẓ al-nafs, al-ʿaql, and al-nasl. Practically, the study proposes a prophetic-centered prevention model integrating value-based education, community-based rehabilitation, and multi-sectoral collaboration, complementing empirical prevention frameworks such as those of BNN (the Indonesian National Narcotics Board) and UNODC.
A Critical Gadamerian Review of M. Syuhudi Ismail's and Muhammad Syahrur's Readings of the Hadith on Female Leadership Ariangga Ramadhansyah; Masruhan; Fairuz Zakirah
WARAQAT : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Waraqat: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam As-Sunnah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51590/waraqat.v11i1.1360

Abstract

The hadith of Abu Bakrah on the prohibition of female leadership (Sahih al-Bukhari nos. 4425 and 7099) has become a battleground for competing paradigms in contemporary hadith hermeneutics. M. Syuhudi Ismail classifies it as a temporal-local hadith, thereby opening space for female leadership across all public domains; Muhammad Syahrur, through the framework of al-sunnah al-nabawiyyah and the theory of al-hudud, positions such hadiths as products of the Prophet's historical ijtihad that are not absolutely binding. This article examines both readings through the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer, particularly the concepts of Vorurteil (prejudice), Wirkungsgeschichte (history of effect), and the rehabilitation of authoritative tradition. The study is library research employing a descriptive-analytical-critical method, drawing on primary hadith sources, classical commentaries (especially Fath al-Bari), the works of both figures, and recent secondary literature from the past decade. The findings are threefold. First, Syahrur performs a prejudice against prejudice, precisely what Gadamer rejects as Enlightenment dogmatism. Second, Syuhudi's temporal-local classification lacks operational criteria that would distinguish it from the imposition of a contemporary horizon upon the text. Third, a more defensible reading, both hermeneutically and according to the manhaj al-muhaddithin, situates the commentarial tradition as a productive Wirkungsgeschichte while preserving the classical distinction between al-wilayah al-uzma and other forms of women's public roles.