Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Abdul Matin Bin Salmand
Pascasarjana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Dekonstruksi Mitos Keagamaan dalam Perspektif Semiotika Roland Barthes: Analisis Wacana Keislaman Kontemporer di Indonesia Meliza; Fadhila Rahmi; Abdul Matin Bin Salmand
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i1.781

Abstract

This study analyzes the construction of religious myths in contemporary Islamic discourse in Indonesia through Roland Barthes’ semiotic perspective. It focuses on the hijab symbol, the concept of sabr, the labeling of kafir, and exclusive salvation claims as forms of meaning naturalization in digital public spaces. The study employs a descriptive-critical qualitative approach using semiotic discourse analysis. Data were collected from digital religious texts and analyzed through sign identification, denotative and connotative analysis, and myth deconstruction. The findings reveal that religious symbols have undergone mythologization processes that make them appear as natural truths. The hijab is constructed as a singular symbol of piety, sabr as legitimation of resignation, kafir as a producer of identity boundaries, and exclusive salvation claims as reinforcement of group superiority. This study confirms that religious meaning is shaped by power relations and discursive reproduction. The findings contribute to interdisciplinary Islamic studies through integrating semiotics, Qur’anic interpretation, sociology of religion, symbolic anthropology, and discourse criticism.
Melampaui Oposisi Biner: Dekonstruksi Sebagai Strategi Pembacaan Tanda Dalam Semiotika Struktural Aman Sobirina; Aminullah; Abdul Matin Bin Salmand
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i1.785

Abstract

This article examines deconstruction as a critical reading strategy against the binary opposition system embedded in structural semiotics. Ferdinand de Saussure's structural semiotics built its foundation upon binary opposition principles such as signifier, langue, and synchrony, which are considered stable and hierarchical. However, Jacques Derrida through the concept of différance fundamentally challenges this stability by arguing that meaning is never fully present but always deferred and differentiated through an endless chain of signifiers. This study employs a qualitative library research method by analyzing primary texts from Derrida and Saussure alongside secondary sources from relevant philosophical and linguistic literature. The results demonstrate that deconstruction does not destroy the semiotic system but rather opens a space of free play of meaning that structural semiotics attempted to close. Différance as a reading strategy reveals that every sign always carries a trace of what it excludes, so that binary opposition is never truly stable. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of poststructuralist philosophy of language and offers a critical perspective for reading texts beyond rigid structural boundaries.
Arkeologi Pengetahuan atas Diskursus Dispensasi Nikah dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer di Indonesia ririn; Karsidi; Abdul Matin Bin Salmand
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i1.791

Abstract

This study examines the discourse of marriage dispensation in contemporary Islamic family law in Indonesia through the archaeology of knowledge approach. The research focuses on identifying discursive formations, epistemes shaping legal knowledge, power relations in the production of legality, and epistemological reconstruction of marriage dispensation within Islamic legal perspectives. This qualitative library research analyzes legal regulations, religious court decisions, and contemporary academic literature. The findings reveal that marriage dispensation is shaped by three main discourses: child protection, preventive morality, and judicial pragmatism. Legal knowledge regarding marriage dispensation is constructed through contestation between classical fiqh episteme, modern child protection paradigms, and contextual judicial rationality. Power relations among the state, judges, religious authorities, and society produce regimes of truth that determine the legality of marriage dispensation. This study recommends an epistemological reconstruction grounded in integrative maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, empirical interdisciplinary approaches, and child centered protection to achieve substantive justice within Indonesian Islamic family law.
Co-Authors Aman Sobirina Aminullah Fadhila Rahmi Karsidi Meliza ririn