Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Amos Saito Hamonangan Simorangkir
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bengkulu,Indonesia
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Konflik Yurisdiksi Antara Pengadilan Kriminal Internasional Dan Pengadilan Hibrid: Analisis Kesenjangan Normatif Muhammad Fajar Lutfi Raihan; Amos Saito Hamonangan Simorangkir; Rivaldi Julianto Ardiansyah
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The existence of two international criminal justice regimes: the permanent International Criminal Court (ICC) and the ad hoc hybrid courts, has given rise to complex and unresolved jurisdictional issues in the contemporary international legal order. This article critically examines the jurisdictional conflict arising between these two mechanisms, with an emphasis on identifying and analyzing the normative gaps underlying the problem. This research employs a juridical-normative approach based on literature review, analyzing primary international legal instruments such as the 1998 Rome Statute, treaties establishing various hybrid courts, and relevant judicial decisions. The research findings indicate that the most significant normative gaps lie in: (1) the absence of a clear jurisdictional hierarchy in international law; (2) inconsistent application of the complementarity principle; (3) differences in procedural and substantive legal standards between institutions; and (4) the inadequacy of existing inter-institutional coordination mechanisms. This article argues that resolving such conflicts requires structural normative reform, not merely partial technical adjustments. Drawing on the experiences of the Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, this study recommends the establishment of a legally binding jurisdictional coordination protocol between the ICC and future hybrid courts.
Problematika Pembuktian Materiil Dan Logika Hukum Tindak Pidana Santet Di Persidangan Denies Salwani; Muhammad Dede Al Farabi Suardi; Ariel Lian Pratama Reksa; Muhammad Fajar Lutfi Raihan; Amos Saito Hamonangan Simorangkir
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Januari-Februari
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/b4dbk874

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the shift in legal paradigms and evidentiary issues related to the criminalization of black magic in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (New Criminal Code). The phenomenon of supernatural powers has long been a social reality in Indonesia, but often causes conflict due to limited regulations in the old Criminal Code. This study uses a qualitative descriptive-analytical method to examine the legal transformation in Article 252 of the New Criminal Code, which classifies the practice of supernatural powers as a crime against public order. The results show that the article uses a formal criminal offense construction, namely emphasizing the act of admitting, offering, or promising the services of supernatural powers that can cause physical or mental suffering. This approach is a pragmatic solution to overcome the difficulty of proving a causal relationship between the practice of black magic and its impacts scientifically. This study concludes that this criminalization provides legal certainty for the practice of shaman fraud, but still has the potential to cause injustice due to subjective interpretations of judges and differences between modern legal reasoning and public beliefs. Therefore, innovation in the justice system is needed through the integration of cross-disciplinary expert testimony to strengthen evidence without ignoring the socio-cultural values of society.
Co-Authors Ariel Lian Pratama Reksa Denies Salwani Muhammad Dede Al Farabi Suardi Muhammad Fajar Lutfi Raihan Rivaldi Julianto Ardiansyah