Nur Kholis Majid
Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Artificial Intelligence dan Tantangan Ideologi Bangsa: Relevansi Pancasila di Era Digital Nur Kholis Majid
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence is moving fast and it is a big problem for the values that Indonesia is based on which is Pancasila. The main goal of this study is to look at the problems that Pancasila is facing because of Artificial Intelligence and to see if Pancasila is still a framework for guiding Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia. The method used to do this research is by looking at the laws and the ideas, behind them. This is done by studying the laws and the concepts that are related to Artificial Intelligence and Pancasila. The research results show that the development of AI has posed challenges in the form of: (1) religious disinformation and degradation of spirituality; (2) algorithmic bias, privacy violations, and dehumanization; (3) filter bubbles, echo chambers, and algorithmic manipulation; (4) manipulation of public opinion and unaccountable decision-making; (5) digital divide and concentration of economic power. The values of Pancasila are relevant as a normative framework for AI governance in Indonesia and can be translated into concrete AI ethical principles such as: (1) the principle of dignified AI; (2) the principle of fair and empathetic AI; (3) the principle of AI that strengthens social cohesion; (4) the principle of accountable and democratic AI; (5) the principle of equitable and inclusive AI.
Pembubaran Ormas Anti Pancasila: Kajian Konstitusional, Pembatasan HAM dan Negara Hukum Nur Kholis Majid
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The dissolution of Social Organizations (Ormas) considered to be in conflict with Pancasila has gained renewed momentum following the issuance of Perppu Number 2 of 2017, which was subsequently enacted into Law Number 16 of 2017. These regulatory changes eliminate judicial mechanisms and grant the government direct authority to revoke the legal entity status or registered certificate of social organizations. This article aims to analyze the legal framework, dissolution mechanisms, and their implications for citizens' constitutional rights and the rule of law. This research uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The research findings indicate that the shift in the dissolution mechanism of social organizations from a judicial model to an administrative one poses three main problems: a weakening of the principle of due process of law, the potential for excessive restrictions on freedom of association, and the absence of standard parameters regarding the phrase "contrary to Pancasila." This article attempts to complement previous studies by offering an analysis based on the human rights limitation test (three-part test) and international standards for the dissolution of associations.