Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora
Rafshahdy Azari Soediro
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pembatasan Usia oleh Perusahaan dalam Rekrutmen Kerja Ditinjau dari Persepektif Hak Asasi Manusia Rafshahdy Azari Soediro
AHKAM Vol 5 No 1 (2026): MARET
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.8821

Abstract

Age-based restrictions in recruitment remain commonly applied by companies in Indonesia, which often specify particular age requirements in job vacancy advertisements on the grounds of efficiency, productivity, and alignment with organizational needs. However, this practice raises serious concerns from a human rights perspective, particularly in relation to the principles of non-discrimination and the right to decent work. This study aimed to analyze age restrictions in recruitment from a human rights standpoint, examine the national and international legal bases governing the right to work, and assess whether age-based limitations can be legally justified. The research employed a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that age-based restrictions in recruitment are, in principle, potentially in violation of human rights standards when they are not grounded in objective, rational, and proportionate reasons. The state has an obligation to protect, respect, and fulfill citizens’ rights to work without discrimination, including discrimination based on age. Therefore, more stringent regulations and effective monitoring mechanisms are required to ensure that recruitment practices are consistent with human rights principles and social justice.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penjualan Harta Pailit yang Mudah Rusak di Bawah Nilai Likuidasi dalam Proses Kepailitan Rafshahdy Azari Soediro
AHKAM Vol 5 No 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10324

Abstract

The sale of bankruptcy assets is an important stage in the settlement of the bankruptcy estate to fulfill payments to creditors. In bankruptcy practice in Indonesia, the sale of perishable bankruptcy assets below liquidation value by the receiver raises legal issues concerning the validity of the receiver’s actions and the limits of their authority under Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK PKPU). This study aims to analyze the regulation of the sale of perishable bankruptcy assets below liquidation value from the perspective of the UUK PKPU and to examine the validity of the receiver’s actions in such sales. This study used a normative juridical legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials were obtained through a literature study of laws and regulations, journals, and other relevant provisions, then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The results show that Article 107 of the UUK PKPU grants discretion to the receiver to sell perishable objects in order to prevent a decline in the value of bankruptcy assets. However, Article 185 paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of the UUK PKPU still require that the sale of bankruptcy assets must first be conducted publicly through an auction mechanism. If the auction fails and is proven by auction minutes, a private sale may be conducted with the permission of the Supervisory Judge. Decree of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 109/KMA/SK/IV/2020 also affirms that the private sale value must not be below the liquidation price. Thus, the sale of perishable bankruptcy assets below liquidation value can only be legally justified if there is an urgent condition that clearly threatens the loss of the economic value of the bankruptcy assets, is carried out in good faith, obtains permission from the Supervisory Judge, does not harm the bankruptcy estate, and is intended to protect the rights and interests of creditors. This study contributes to strengthening bankruptcy law studies, particularly concerning the limits of the receiver’s discretion in settling perishable bankruptcy assets.
Co-Authors