Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veteran Justice Journal
Mutiara Cemerlang Nitiasa
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Mekanisme Legislasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara: Komparasi Indonesia Inggris Putri Ayu Ajeng Nina Zuraida; Kaisya Jamilatul Ghofiroh; Mutiara Cemerlang Nitiasa; Nabila Shifa Khairunnisa; Sicilia Sandra Yudisthira
VJJ Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Veteran Justice Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The legislative mechanism is a crucial factor in Constitutional Law because it serves as a tool for translating political will into binding law. We will compare Indonesia and the Inggris in this study because they have different legal structures and forms of government. Indonesia, as a country with a civil law tradition and a presidential system, places the law-making process within a joint framework between the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President, as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 12 of 2011 in conjunction with Law No. 13 of 2022. Meanwhile, the Inggris, which inherited the common law tradition and a parliamentary system, implements legislation through a bicameral mechanism between the House of Commons and the House of Lords based on the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty where parliament is positioned as the holder of the highest legal authority. This study uses a normative juridical method to analyze the normative structure and constitutional implementation in both countries. This study uses data derived from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study suggest that although both countries have similarities in the application of a bicameral system and the existence of control mechanisms for the quality of legislation, fundamental differences are seen in the legal system, the position of the executive in the legislative process, and the existence or absence of a written constitution as a formal basis. With a comparative approach, this research aims to clarify the theoretical understanding of Indonesian and Inggris legislative regulations as two countries with legislative regulation-making mechanisms that are based on different legal systems. Keywords: Legislation; Comparative Constitutional Law; Presidential-Parliamentary System; Civil Law; Common Law.
Penerapan Diversi Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Mutiara Cemerlang Nitiasa; Anandita Putri Maritza
VJJ Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Veteran Justice Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini menganalisis konflik sinkronisasi normatif antara UU ITE sebagai lex generalis yang menetapkan sanksi retributif dengan UU SPPA sebagai lex specialis yang mengedepankan perlindungan anak, dalam konteks Anak Berhadapan dengan Hukum (ABH) pelaku delik siber. Secara normatif, diversi wajib dilaksanakan sebagai manifestasi restorative justice karena ancaman pidana di bawah tujuh tahun. Namun, implementasi diversi rentan terhadap kegagalan (non-consensus) karena kendala substantif unik pada kejahatan digital, meliputi anonimitas pelaku, kerugian non-materiil (rusaknya reputasi korban), serta hambatan jarak geografis. Ketika upaya diversi gagal, asas lex specialis UU SPPA tetap berlaku secara dominan sehingga mewajibkan hakim menerapkan batasan sanksi setengah dari maksimum pidana orang dewasa yang termuat dalam Pasal 81 ayat (2) UU SPPA dan memprioritaskan penjatuhan pidana tindakan (maatregel) melalui penemuan hukum (rechtsvinding). Hasil penelitian ini menekankan perlunya penyusunan pedoman teknis restorative justice berbasis ruang digital dan peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum dalam tindak pidana siber yang dilakukan oleh anak untuk mengoptimalisasi diversi. Kata Kunci: Diversi; Restorative Justice; Pencemaran Nama Baik; Perlindungan Anak; Kejahatan Siber. Abstract This study demonstrates the normative synchronization conflict between the ITE Law, as a general lex that stipulates retributive sanctions, and the SPPA Law, as a special lex that prioritizes child protection, in the context of Children in Conflict with the Law (ABH) who commit cyber crimes. Normatively, diversion must be implemented as a manifestation of restorative justice because the criminal threat is under seven years. However, the implementation of diversion is vulnerable to failure (non-consensus) due to substantive constraints unique to digital crimes, including the anonymity of the perpetrator, non- material losses (damage to the victim's reputation), and the obstacle of geographic distance. When diversion efforts fail, the lex specialis principle of the SPPA Law remains dominant, requiring judges to apply a sanction limit of half the maximum adult sentence contained in Article 81 paragraph (2) of the SPPA Law and prioritize the imposition of criminal actions (maatregel) through legal discovery (rechtsvinding). The results of this study emphasize the need to develop technical guidelines for digital- based restorative justice and increase the capacity of law enforcement officers in cybercrimes committed by children to optimize diversion. Keywords: Keywords: Diversion; Restorative Justice; Defamation; Child Protection; Cyber Crime.
Co-Authors Anandita Putri Maritza Kaisya Jamilatul Ghofiroh Nabila Shifa Khairunnisa Putri Ayu Ajeng Nina Zuraida Sicilia Sandra Yudisthira