Jovita Jutamulia
Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Semaglutide and the Risk of Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischaemic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jovita Jutamulia; Elfira Sutanto
Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijmr.v6i2.884

Abstract

Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), has emerged as an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity management. However, recent pharmacovigilance and observational studies have raised concerns regarding a potential association between semaglutide use and non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a serious form of optic neuropathy causing sudden vision loss. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies examining the association between semaglutide exposure and NAION risk. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar without date restrictions, with the final search completed on 31 March 2026. Study selection was based on predefined inclusion criteria, and quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic. Publication bias was examined using funnel plots and Egger’s regression test. Six observational studies comprising 699,141 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, semaglutide was associated with a significantly increased risk of NAION (pooled HR 1.802; 95% CI 1.221–2.658; p = 0.003). Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I² = 72.8%, Q = 18.37, p = 0.003). Subgroup analyses revealed that the positive association was driven by four prospective cohort studies reporting elevated NAION risk (HR = 2.402; 95% CI 1.662–3.468), whereas two retrospective studies reported null associations (HR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.60–1.60). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated robustness of the primary finding. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides evidence of a potential increased risk of NAION associated with semaglutide use in observational studies, particularly among individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Clinical awareness of this signal is warranted, and further prospective investigation is recommended.
Efficacy and Safety of Travoprost Intraocular Implants in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jovita Jutamulia; Agnestya Christine Zely Raule
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 7 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i7.1628

Abstract

Background: Open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) are leading causes of irreversible visual impairment and require lifelong reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP). Topical prostaglandin analogues are the standard first-line therapy, yet their effectiveness is constrained by poor adherence. The travoprost 75 µg intracameral implant has emerged as a sustained-release alternative designed to bypass these adherence barriers. The present systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively synthesised the efficacy and safety of this device in adults with OAG or OHT. Methods: PubMed was searched in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Original research articles evaluating the travoprost 75 µg intracameral implant in adults with OAG or OHT were eligible. Two reviewers screened, extracted data, and independently appraised risk of bias using Cochrane RoB 2.0 (RCTs) or the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (non-randomised). Standardised mean changes in IOP were synthesised as Hedges' g under a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model with Knapp–Hartung adjustment. Pre-specified sensitivity, leave-one-out, alternative-pool, and design sub-group analyses were performed. The funnel plot was inspected; Egger's test was deferred because k < 10. Results: Of 30 PubMed records, 10 original research studies were eligible and 6 contributed to the primary quantitative synthesis (2,152 total enrolled participants; 1,525 implant-arm participants pooled in the within-group synthesis). The pooled within-group Hedges' g for IOP reduction was 4.35 (95% CI 3.14 to 5.56; p = 0.0002). Heterogeneity was very high (I² = 96.1%, τ² = 1.121, Q = 53.64, p < 0.0001). The 95% prediction interval, derived from the same model, spanned approximately 1.13 to 7.56. The randomised-controlled-trial-only pool (k = 4) yielded a more conservative pooled estimate of g = 3.76 (95% CI 2.94 to 4.58; I² = 88.6%). Leave-one-out analyses confirmed robustness (g range 3.98–4.56). Serious ocular adverse events were rare (one endophthalmitis in the slow-eluting arm of the GC-010 phase 3 trial, with no further cases in the remaining cohorts); transient ocular hyperemia, iritis, and elevated IOP were the most common, broadly consistent with the topical-travoprost class profile. Conclusion: The travoprost 75 µg intracameral implant produced a large and consistent reduction in IOP across designs and follow-up windows, with a safety profile non-inferior to topical timolol 0.5%. The substantial heterogeneity, near-uniform sponsor footprint, and limited head-to-head comparisons against topical prostaglandin monotherapy temper the certainty of the evidence and warrant pragmatic, independent, multi-ethnic trials. Within these limits, the implant is a clinically meaningful addition to interventional glaucoma therapy, particularly for patients in whom topical adherence is the dominant driver of disease progression.
Efficacy and Safety of Travoprost Intraocular Implants in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jovita Jutamulia; Agnestya Christine Zely Raule
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 7 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i7.1628

Abstract

Background: Open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) are leading causes of irreversible visual impairment and require lifelong reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP). Topical prostaglandin analogues are the standard first-line therapy, yet their effectiveness is constrained by poor adherence. The travoprost 75 µg intracameral implant has emerged as a sustained-release alternative designed to bypass these adherence barriers. The present systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively synthesised the efficacy and safety of this device in adults with OAG or OHT. Methods: PubMed was searched in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Original research articles evaluating the travoprost 75 µg intracameral implant in adults with OAG or OHT were eligible. Two reviewers screened, extracted data, and independently appraised risk of bias using Cochrane RoB 2.0 (RCTs) or the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (non-randomised). Standardised mean changes in IOP were synthesised as Hedges' g under a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model with Knapp–Hartung adjustment. Pre-specified sensitivity, leave-one-out, alternative-pool, and design sub-group analyses were performed. The funnel plot was inspected; Egger's test was deferred because k < 10. Results: Of 30 PubMed records, 10 original research studies were eligible and 6 contributed to the primary quantitative synthesis (2,152 total enrolled participants; 1,525 implant-arm participants pooled in the within-group synthesis). The pooled within-group Hedges' g for IOP reduction was 4.35 (95% CI 3.14 to 5.56; p = 0.0002). Heterogeneity was very high (I² = 96.1%, τ² = 1.121, Q = 53.64, p < 0.0001). The 95% prediction interval, derived from the same model, spanned approximately 1.13 to 7.56. The randomised-controlled-trial-only pool (k = 4) yielded a more conservative pooled estimate of g = 3.76 (95% CI 2.94 to 4.58; I² = 88.6%). Leave-one-out analyses confirmed robustness (g range 3.98–4.56). Serious ocular adverse events were rare (one endophthalmitis in the slow-eluting arm of the GC-010 phase 3 trial, with no further cases in the remaining cohorts); transient ocular hyperemia, iritis, and elevated IOP were the most common, broadly consistent with the topical-travoprost class profile. Conclusion: The travoprost 75 µg intracameral implant produced a large and consistent reduction in IOP across designs and follow-up windows, with a safety profile non-inferior to topical timolol 0.5%. The substantial heterogeneity, near-uniform sponsor footprint, and limited head-to-head comparisons against topical prostaglandin monotherapy temper the certainty of the evidence and warrant pragmatic, independent, multi-ethnic trials. Within these limits, the implant is a clinically meaningful addition to interventional glaucoma therapy, particularly for patients in whom topical adherence is the dominant driver of disease progression.