Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Tasyree: Jurnal Bisnis, Keuangan dan Ekonomi Syariah The Republic: Journal of Constitutional Law Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Punggawa Law Review
Alendra Nauval Mufti Rayhan
University of Brawijaya
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Politik Hukum Hak Uji Materiil AD/ART Partai Politik dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 39 P/HUM/202 Alendra Nauval Mufti Rayhan; Salsabil Aqila Tasnim; Muhammad Al Fasya
Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Vol 10 No 1 (2026): Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tapis.v10i1.12713

Abstract

This study examines the legal policy underlying the material judicial review of the Articles of Association and Bylaws (AD/ART) of political parties in the Supreme Court Decision No. 39 P/HUM/2021. The issue is important because the position of political party AD/ART raises theoretical debates regarding the scope of statutory regulations and the authority of the Supreme Court in judicial review, while practically affecting internal party democracy and the protection of party members’ rights. Previous studies generally focus on the authority of the Supreme Court or disputes within political parties, whereas this research specifically analyses the legal policy behind the limitation of judicial review objects concerning political party AD/ART.This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials include Supreme Court Decision No. 39 P/HUM/2021, Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Laws and Regulations, and Law No. 2 of 2011 on Political Parties, supported by secondary legal materials from books and scientific journals.The study finds that the Supreme Court adopted a formalistic interpretation of statutory regulations and declared the petition inadmissible because political party AD/ART do not possess generally binding legal force. The decision reflects a legal policy aimed at maintaining legal certainty regarding the limits of material judicial review objects. However, the ruling also indicates the need for a clearer legal mechanism to supervise internal political party norms that have broader public implications within a democratic system.
Integrasi Islamic Renewable Fund dan Green Islamic Note untuk Microgrid Hijau Berbasis Ekonomi Syariah Zahira Al-Ghifari; Aisyah Adifa Azzahidah; Nazwa Zaliaputri; Alendra Nauval Mufti Rayhan
Al-Tasyree: Jurnal Bisnis, Keuangan dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 18 No. 01 (2026): Al-Tasyree: Jurnal Bisnis, Keuangan dan Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Prodi Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universitas PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59833/jw2ntw36

Abstract

The global energy crisis and rising carbon emissions caused by the continued dependence on fossil fuels have become major challenges to sustainable development, including in Indonesia. In the higher education sector, the implementation of renewable energy through the green campus concept still faces significant obstacles, particularly limited green financing, low participation of academic communities, and the lack of integration between Islamic economics and renewable energy technology. Nevertheless, universities possess a strategic role as centers of innovation and education capable of fostering a younger generation that supports the transition toward a sustainable Islamic green economy. This research employs a normative-juridical method using conceptual and qualitative-descriptive approaches with a normative-conceptual orientation through library research on regulations, Islamic economic theories, green finance, and renewable energy concepts. The study aims to formulate an innovative, participatory, and sustainable sharia-based financing model to support the development of green microgrids within university environments through the integration of the Islamic Renewable Fund (IRF) and Green Islamic Note (GIN). The findings reveal that GIN functions as a community-based Islamic green financing instrument that enables students, lecturers, alumni, and the broader academic community to participate as investors in renewable energy projects through a digital, transparent, and sharia-compliant mechanism. In addition to serving as a micro-investment scheme based on mudharabah and musyarakah principles, GIN also acts as an experiential learning platform that strengthens students’ green skills, Islamic financial literacy, leadership capacity, and ecological awareness. Therefore, the integration of IRF and GIN has the potential to establish energy-independent and environmentally sustainable campuses while simultaneously advancing Islamic economic development in the era of global energy transition.
KONSEP KEADILAN JOHN RAWLS DALAM PRAKTIK PENGUJIAN OPEN LEGAL POLICY OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Alendra Nauval Mufti Rayhan
The Republic : Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): THE REPUBLIC : Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara dan diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara dan Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/htn.v4i1.2842

Abstract

Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas penafsiran konstitusional terhadap doktrin Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka dalam praktik pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia serta kaitannya dengan prinsip keadilan dalam konsep John Rawls. Kebijakan hukum terbuka merupakan konsep yang menegaskan adanya kebebasan bagi pembentuk undang-undang untuk menentukan materi muatan hukum yang tidak secara eksplisit diatur dalam UUD NRI 1945. Namun, kebebasan tersebut tidak bersifat mutlak karena harus tunduk pada batasan tertentu. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus (case approach), serta mengkaji berbagai putusan penting Mahkamah Konstitusi seperti Putusan Nomor 10/PUU-III/2005, 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008, 22/PUU-XV/2017, 90/PUU-XXI/2023, dan 62/PUU-XXII/2024. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemaknaan terhadap kebijakan hukum terbuka mengalami perkembangan dinamis. Pada periode awal, Mahkamah Konstitusi menerapkan prinsip judicial restraint dengan menahan diri untuk tidak memasuki ranah pembentuk undang-undang. Namun, dalam perkembangan selanjutnya, Mahkamah Konstitusi bertransformasi ke arah judicial activism dengan menilai substansi keadilan dari suatu kebijakan. Dalam berbagai putusannya, Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadikan keadilan sebagai ukuran utama dalam menentukan konstitusionalitas suatu norma yang bernilai kebijakan hukum terbuka, selaras dengan konsep keadilan dari John Rawls yang menekankan pure procedural justice. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa doktrin kebijakan hukum terbuka bukanlah wilayah kekuasaan mutlak pembentuk undang-undang, melainkan bagian integral dari mekanisme pengawasan konstitusional untuk mewujudkan keadilan substantif dalam negara hukum demokratis (rechtsstaat).  
Beyond Capital Relocation: Comparative Constitutional Study from Kazakhstan for the Future of Indonesia’s Nusantara Alendra Nauval Mufti Rayhan
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The relocation of Indonesia’s capital city to Nusantara (IKN) represents the culmination of a long-standing discourse on capital relocation dating back to the era of President Sukarno. Although intended to address Jakarta’s structural challenges and promote equitable national development, the implementation of IKN continues to face various constitutional and governance issues, including legal uncertainty, limited public participation, questions regarding the legitimacy of the Nusantara Capital Authority, agrarian conflicts, and the absence of local democratic representation. This study aims to analyze the constitutional problems surrounding the relocation of Indonesia’s capital city and to compare them with the successful relocation of Kazakhstan’s capital from Almaty to Astana. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that Kazakhstan’s success was supported by strong legal certainty, policy consistency, sustainable development planning, protection of citizens’ rights, and the preservation of representative local institutions within the capital’s governance structure. In contrast, Indonesia continues to encounter normative and institutional obstacles that may hinder the effectiveness of the relocation process. This study concludes that strengthening legal certainty, ensuring meaningful public participation, protecting community rights, and enhancing democratic representation are essential mechanisms for achieving an effective, efficient, and sustainable capital relocation.
Co-Authors Aisyah Adifa Azzahidah Muhammad Al Fasya Nazwa Zaliaputri Salsabil Aqila Tasnim Zahira Al-Ghifari