Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS)
Try Mulyoto
Universitas Budi Luhur
Computer Science & IT

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparative Analysis of BGP, OSPF, and RIP Dynamic Routing Protocols in Metro Ethernet Network and Broadband Service Implementation Ekie Revsie Akbar; Try Mulyoto; Imelda Imelda
International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): APRIL 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Komunitas Informasi Teknologi Aceh (KITA), Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v6i1.7141

Abstract

The reliability of Internet Service Provider (ISP) networks increasingly depends on the routing protocols employed to manage traffic across distributed infrastructure. This study investigates and compares the operational performance of three widely adopted dynamic routing protocols — Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), and Routing Information Protocol (RIP) — deployed across the Metro Ethernet network of PT Kreatif Data Prima Nusantara, a regional ISP located in Kedaton, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. The existing network architecture relies on a combined deployment of static routing and OSPF distributed across four Points of Presence (POP): QNN, Tamin, Labuhan Dalam, and INQI. This hybrid configuration has repeatedly produced prolonged convergence delays, operational complexity in fault isolation, and constrained scalability. A simulation-based experimental methodology was adopted, replicating the physical network topology using MikroTik RouterOS-based Cloud Core Routers (CCR). Key performance indicators evaluated include convergence time, CPU utilization, bandwidth overhead, and overall network availability. Experimental outcomes clearly show BGP's superior performance: an average convergence time of 18.36 seconds — substantially faster than RIP's 28.34 seconds and more resource-efficient across all measured dimensions, despite OSPF's faster raw reconvergence at 3.21 seconds; CPU utilization of only 11% compared to 19% for OSPF and 38% for RIP; and bandwidth overhead of 1.9 Kbps versus 9.2 Kbps for OSPF and 26.8 Kbps for RIP. BGP also recorded the highest network availability at 99.98%. The simulation topology encompasses four POPs — a relatively small-scale environment — and results should be read within that scope. These findings support the recommendation that PT Kreatif Data Prima Nusantara adopt a full BGP deployment as its primary routing strategy to improve long-term operational efficiency, network manageability, and service reliability.
Performance Trade-Off Between Windows 10 and Windows 11: A Comparative Analysis of CPU and Memory Behavior Using Performance Monitor and LatencyMon Ekie Revsie Akbar; Muhammad Fadhil Rachman; Tiara Fitriana; Try Mulyoto; Yan Everhard Riwurohi
International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): AUGUST 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Komunitas Informasi Teknologi Aceh (KITA), Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v6i2.7560

Abstract

The operating system consumes processor and memory resources and affects kernel-level responsiveness before user applications run, and these resource demands may differ across operating system versions. This study compared Windows 10 and Windows 11 under a realistic and reproducible video transcoding workload performed with HandBrake, measuring CPU utilization, hard page faults, and interrupt-to-process latency. A quantitative experimental method was used. Performance Monitor recorded CPU and memory behavior, while LatencyMon measured kernel timer, interrupt service routine, deferred procedure call, and interrupt-to-process latency. An important constraint is that the two operating systems were tested on physically different devices with processors from different generations: a 6th-generation dual-core Intel Core i7-6600U and an 11th-generation quad-core Intel Core i7-1165G7. Therefore, the measured differences cannot be attributed to the operating system version alone. Windows 11 showed more sustained CPU utilization and recorded fewer hard page faults than Windows 10 (22,480 versus 50,539), although the difference is also subject to the unequal monitoring durations. Windows 10 recorded a lower highest interrupt-to-process latency (1,147.60 µs versus 1,430.70 µs) and a lower average interrupt latency (10.10 µs versus 22.44 µs), while both systems remained within the conventional real-time suitability threshold. The findings indicate that the observed performance differences are entangled with processor generation and other hardware-related effects. Therefore, a dual-boot configuration on identical hardware is recommended in future studies to isolate the effect of the operating system version.
Co-Authors Ekie Revsie Akbar Imelda, Imelda Muhammad Fadhil Rachman Tiara Fitriana Yan Everhard Riwurohi