p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal HUKUM BISNIS
AZIZ PANJI A.
Universitas Narotama

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

HARMONISASI NORMA KERJA INTERNASIONAL KE DALAM HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN INDONESIA: KAJIAN HUKUM NORMATIF AZIZ PANJI A.
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 10 No 6 (2026): Volume 10 No 6 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the issue of harmonization between international labor law norms, particularly the International Labor Organization (ILO) conventions ratified by Indonesia, and domestic labor regulations. The main problem is that Indonesia has ratified 26 ILO conventions, including all eight fundamental conventions, but there is a consistent gap between these international commitments and the actual legal conditions of labor. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach, a comparative approach, and a historical approach. Primary legal materials include ratified ILO conventions, Law No. 13 of 2003 on Manpower, and Law No. 6 of 2023. The study found three main structural problems: first, the mechanism for transforming international norms into Indonesian national law is inconsistent and lacks clear standards; second, Law No. 6 of 2023, which is the enactment of the Job Creation Perppu, contains a number of provisions that run counter to ILO protection standards; and third, the weak labor inspection system perpetuates the gap between written law and actual practice despite legislative reforms. This study argues that true harmonization requires more than just formal ratification; it requires substantive legislative transformation and effective enforcement. Keywords: Labour Law, ILO Conventions, Legal Harmonization, Norm Transformation, Job Creation Law
RELASI KONSEPTUAL ILMU NEGARA DAN PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM DALAM SISTEM PENDIDIKAN HUKUM INDONESIA AZIZ PANJI A.
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 10 No 4 (2026): Volume 10 No 4 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the conceptual relationship between State Science (Staatslehre) and Introduction to Legal Studies (PIH) as two foundational courses in Indonesian legal education. The central problem addressed is why two disciplines that conceptually support each other are consistently treated as independent entities in the curriculum, and what the intellectual consequences of this separation are. This study employs normative legal research methodology using conceptual and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials include statutory provisions relevant to the formation of Indonesia's rechtsstaat, while secondary legal materialsencompass literature in constitutional law theory, state theory, and legal philosophy from verifiable sources. The findings demonstrate that State Science and PIH stand in a coconstitutive relationship: State Science provides the ontological foundation for why the state has authority to create and enforce law, while PIH explains how that authority is actualized within a positive norm system. The concept of the rechtsstaat constitutes the strongest intersection point between them. The existing pedagogical separation produces a structural comprehension deficit in law students, and this study argues that curricular integration is not merely a pedagogical preference but a requirement of epistemological coherence. Keywords: State Science, Introduction to Legal Studies, Staatslehre, Rechtsstaat, Normative Legal Education