Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Evidence Of Law
Muhammad Arif Sahlepi
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of the Implementation of the Rights of Patients with Mental Disorders to Access Health Services in Hospitals Farhan Farhan; Muhammad Arif Sahlepi; Irsyam Risdawati
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Journal Evidence Of Law (April)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v5i1.2451

Abstract

The rights of patients with mental disorders are an integral part of efforts to provide fair and equitable health services. In this context, hospitals as health institutions have a responsibility to ensure that patients with mental disorders get their rights, including access to quality health services. This research focuses on the implementation of the rights of patients with mental disorders in obtaining access to health services at Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ildrem Hospital, North Sumatra. The main focus of this study is to evaluate the extent to which the rights of patients with mental disorders are guaranteed and fulfilled in the hospital service system. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive type of research. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with relevant parties, such as medical personnel, patients with mental disorders, and hospital managers. In addition, direct observation of health service practices in hospitals is also carried out to get a more complete picture of the implementation of patient rights. This study aims to analyze the extent of the implementation of the rights of patients with mental disorders at Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ildrem Hospital. and to find out the factors that affect patients' access to health services, as well as to identify obstacles and challenges faced in the implementation of patients' rights. The results of the study show that although there are policies that support the protection of the rights of patients with mental disorders, their implementation in the field still faces various challenges. Some of the factors that affect access to health services for patients with mental disorders include social stigma against mental disorders, limited facilities and trained human resources, and lack of adequate understanding from some medical workers regarding the rights of patients with mental disorders. Conclusion of this study The implementation of the rights of patients with mental disorders at Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ildrem Hospital still needs to be improved, especially in terms of fulfilling access to health services in accordance with their rights. Social stigma and limited resources are the main obstacles that need to be overcome.
Implementation of Law No. 17 of 2023 on Dispute Resolution between Patients and Health Workers in Complications of Eye Surgery M. Ammar Al Ghifari; Irsyam Risdawati; Muhammad Arif Sahlepi
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Journal Evidence Of Law (April)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v5i1.2490

Abstract

Medical complications, particularly in eye surgery, are inherent risks that may lead to disputes between patients and healthcare providers. In Indonesia, Law Number 17 of 2023 and Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024 emphasize non-litigation mechanisms, especially mediation, as the primary approach to resolving medical disputes. This framework aims to protect both parties while reducing the burden of litigation. This study analyzes the implementation of these regulations in resolving disputes arising from ophthalmic surgical complications, focusing on legal certainty, justice, and balanced protection.This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and literature approaches. The analyzed regulations include Law Number 17 of 2023, Law Number 29 of 2004, Law Number 36 of 2009, Law Number 30 of 1999, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016. Secondary data from textbooks, journals, case reports, and court decisions were examined using qualitative descriptive analysis.The findings indicate that mediation serves as a mandatory initial step in resolving medical disputes. Non-litigation pathways are considered faster, more cost-effective, and less confrontational than litigation. Professional disciplinary bodies play a crucial role in assessing alleged negligence proportionally. Legal protection for healthcare providers is ensured without neglecting patients’ rights. Overall, the regulation strengthens a restorative justice approach, maintains the therapeutic relationship, and balances rights and obligations, although challenges remain in technical implementation and public awareness.
Co-Authors Farhan Farhan Irsyam Risdawati M. Ammar Al Ghifari