Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Assessing the Impact of Ecofeminist Policy on Gender and Environmental Practices Muhammad Asif; Yassine Chami; Mohamad Abou Adel; Mohammad Alhourani; Moustafa Abouelnour
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v4i2.251

Abstract

Global environmental degradation and persistent gender inequality continue to challenge the achievement of sustainable development in Pakistan. Although Pakistan has ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and adopted the Sustainable Development Goals, the government still implements environmental and gender policies in a fragmented and sectoral manner. Policymakers continue to prioritize normative approaches that fail to address patriarchal domination, women’s marginalization, and environmental exploitation in an integrated framework. This study examines the urgency of strengthening ecofeminist policies within a sustainable socio ecological framework that promotes gender justice and environmental sustainability. The research applies a juridical normative method combined with a comparative policy approach through an examination of environmental governance practices in Pakistan and Sierra de Santa Rosa. The findings reveal that Pakistan has not established comprehensive policies capable of integrating gender equality with environmental governance. In contrast, Sierra de Santa Rosa implements a participatory and community-oriented model that enables women to contribute actively to environmental conservation, sustainable agriculture, and local economic development. This study concludes that Pakistan must strengthen gender responsive environmental governance by integrating institutions, encouraging community participation, increasing women’s involvement in decision making processes, and promoting cross sectoral collaboration to achieve long term socio ecological sustainability.
Toward a One-Roof System and an Independent Tax Court: Indonesia between the United States and Germany Efendi Ibnususilo; Yassine Chami; Saminu Abacha Wakili; Faiqah Nur Azizah
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i3.291

Abstract

The research departs from a fundamental problem, the dual roof system that historically placed the Tax Court under divided supervision between the judiciary and the executive, particularly the Ministry of Finance, thereby creating structural ambiguity and potential conflicts of interest between tax collection and adjudication functions. This condition raised concerns regarding the judicial independence, accountability, and public trust in tax dispute resolution. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study analyses constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, and institutional practices governing the Tax Court. The research finds that, first, the reform of Indonesia’s tax adjudication system reflects a constitutional imperative to secure genuine judicial independence by ending the dual roof structure and fully integrating the Tax Court under the authority of Supreme Court, as mandated by Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Second, comparative insights from the United States and Germany demonstrate that effective judicial independence in tax matters requires structural separation from fiscal authorities, hierarchical judicial review, professional specialisation, and administrative as well as financial autonomy. Moreover, procedural differentiation, digital transparency, and layered oversight mechanisms are essential to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure accountability within a unified judicial framework. Third, as a policy model, Indonesia should adopt a fully integrated one-roof tax court system supported by tiered appellate review, institutional autonomy, specialised judicial training, and comprehensive digital governance to guarantee an independent, transparent, and accountable tax judiciary.