Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Edukasi dan Aksi Bersih Pantai sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kesadaran Pemuda terhadap Kebersihan Lingkungan Pesisir di Pantai Labombo Miftahul Hairia; Fretty Sumbung Parerung; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding; Islah Audziah Putri Beang
Abdimas Singkerru Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Akademi Teknologi Industri Dewantara Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59563/singkerru.v5i2.345

Abstract

Permasalahan sampah di kawasan pesisir menjadi isu penting yang berdampak pada kerusakan ekosistem, penurunan kualitas lingkungan, serta kesehatan masyarakat. Pantai Labombo di Kota Palopo merupakan salah satu kawasan pesisir yang memiliki potensi wisata, namun masih menghadapi permasalahan kebersihan akibat akumulasi sampah. Kondisi ini menunjukkan perlunya upaya peningkatan kesadaran masyarakat, khususnya pemuda, dalam menjaga kebersihan lingkungan pesisir. Kegiatan ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan, kesadaran, dan partisipasi pemuda terhadap kebersihan lingkungan pesisir melalui edukasi dan aksi bersih pantai. Metode pelaksanaan kegiatan dilakukan secara partisipatif dengan melibatkan pemuda setempat sebagai mitra kegiatan. Kegiatan dilaksanakan melalui tiga tahapan utama, yaitu edukasi kebersihan dan kelestarian lingkungan pesisir, sosialisasi dampak sampah dan pengelolaan sampah sederhana, serta aksi partisipatif bersih pantai. Edukasi dilakukan melalui penyampaian materi secara interaktif, sedangkan aksi bersih pantai dilakukan secara berkelompok untuk meningkatkan keterlibatan peserta secara langsung di lapangan. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pemahaman peserta mengenai pentingnya menjaga kebersihan lingkungan pesisir serta dampak negatif sampah terhadap ekosistem dan kesehatan. Peserta yang terbagi dalam beberapa kelompok menunjukkan partisipasi aktif dalam kegiatan bersih pantai dengan mengumpulkan berbagai jenis sampah, terutama sampah plastik. Kegiatan ini memberikan manfaat berupa meningkatnya kesadaran lingkungan, keterampilan dalam pengelolaan sampah sederhana, serta terbentuknya sikap peduli lingkungan di kalangan pemuda. Kegiatan ini menyimpulkan bahwa integrasi antara edukasi dan aksi partisipatif efektif dalam meningkatkan keterlibatan pemuda dalam menjaga kebersihan lingkungan pesisir. Pendekatan berbasis pengalaman langsung menjadi aspek penting dalam membentuk kesadaran dan perilaku peduli lingkungan secara berkelanjutan.
Kesalahan Umum (Human Error) Dalam Perhitungan Volume Pekerjaan Dinding Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pembengkakan Rab Studi Kasus: Gedung Politeknik Dewantara Herlina Herlina; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Sains, Teknik, Ekonomi, dan Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): SATEDIK - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/satedik.v2i2.1935

Abstract

Precision in calculating construction work volumes is a critical aspect of preparing a Bill of Quantities (BoQ) and Cost Budget Plan (RAB) to prevent budget overruns and material shortages on site. This study aims to identify common estimator human errors and quantitatively analyze their impacts on material quantity deviations and cost overruns in the wall construction of the Dewantara Polytechnic Building in Palopo City. The research method employs a descriptive quantitative analysis comparing manual estimator calculations with corrected technical calculations based on AHSP 2026 standards (SE Dirjen Bina Konstruksi No. 47/SE/Dk/2026). Primary data were obtained from local material market price surveys in Palopo City in 2026, while secondary data included Detail Engineering Design (DED) drawings and AHSP 2026 guidelines. Quantitative results indicate that dominant human errors include failure to deduct frame opening areas, neglecting material waste factors, and inaccuracy in converting loose to compacted sand volume. In a sample classroom area of 70.00 m², the failure to deduct an opening area of 8.04 m² triggered a wall area overestimation of 12.98%. Consequently, this led to a budget overestimation for light brick procurement by 7.60% and Portland cement by 7.62%. Conversely, ignoring the sand volume conversion factor caused a sand requirement underestimation of 10.68%, posing a risk of halting construction operations due to material shortages. Overall, these accumulated human errors caused a total budget overrun of 5.90% to 7.28% for wall materials compared to actual requirements. Correcting calculations based on AHSP 2026 technical guidelines and adopting Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology effectively eliminate these discrepancies and enhance project cost estimation efficiency.
Analisis Finansial Pekerjaan Finishing Dinding : Perbandingan Biaya Cat Konvensional Vs Pemasangan Wallpaper (Studi Kasus: Kota Palopo) Atikah Aulia Anton; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Sains, Teknik, Ekonomi, dan Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): SATEDIK - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/satedik.v2i2.1940

Abstract

Wall finishing work represents a vital component in both building construction and renovation, exerting a significant impact on estimated total life-cycle costs as well as overall aesthetic value (Nurhayati & Wibowo, 2021). The selection of interior finishing materials affects not only initial financial outlays but also dictates the frequency and cumulative expenses of periodic maintenance throughout a building’s operational lifespan. This study aims to analyze and compare the financial feasibility and long-term cost efficiency between the application of conventional paint and wallpaper installation on interior walls in Palopo City. The research methodology employs a descriptive quantitative approach based on Budget Plan (Rencana Anggaran Biaya / RAB) analysis, referencing the local Unit Price of Work (Harga Satuan Pekerjaan / HSP) standards in Palopo City (Dinas PUPR Kota Palopo, 2025; Ministry of PUPR, 2022). This evaluation is enhanced through Direct Life-Cycle Costing (DLCC) modeling to assess the durability and effective service life of materials over a 10-year observation horizon (Kirk & Dell'Isola, 2015). Technical parameters regarding material degradation rates and maintenance intervals were compiled from supporting literature and local climatic conditions of Palopo City. The calculated results indicate that the initial investment cost (initial cost) for conventional paint work is IDR 28,500/m², whereas wallpaper installation requires an initial cost of IDR 68,000/m². Although conventional paint demonstrates a lower initial cost—approximately 2.38 times cheaper than wallpaper—the 10-year life-cycle cost analysis reveals a contrasting financial perspective. Due to the susceptibility of conventional paint to high humidity, which necessitates repainting every 3 years, the cumulative cost for maintenance and reapplication reaches IDR 114,000/m² by the end of the 10th year (Pratama & Supriyadi, 2023). In contrast, vinyl wallpaper proves to maintain an effective service life of up to 10 years without requiring periodic replacement, keeping its cumulative expenditure at IDR 68,000/m². This study concludes that from a long-term investment perspective, wallpaper is significantly more economical, offering a cost-saving potential of 40.3% (IDR 46,000/m²) compared to conventional paint for property owners in Palopo City.
Analisis Biaya Dinding Plesteran Acian Vs Dinding Bata Ekspos Sederhana (Studi Kasus: Kota Palopo) Intang Intang; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1944

Abstract

Research on wall construction cost comparisons in Palopo City concludes that using simple exposed brick walls is much more economical and efficient than conventional plastering and skimming methods. Based on unit price analysis, the total cost for conventional wall construction requires an expenditure of Rp249,380.32 per m2. In contrast, the simple exposed brick method, which relies only on quality red bricks, neat joint finishing, and a transparent anti-moss coating, costs only Rp170,250.00 per m2. Although the material price for red bricks specifically chosen for the exposed method is slightly higher at the initial purchase, this approach proves capable of cutting the budget by up to 31.73%, saving approximately Rp79,130.32 per m2. This major saving occurs because the method completely eliminates the need for cement and sand materials for both plastering and skimming. Aside from financial advantages, eliminating the plastering and skimming stages also directly impacts the efficiency of worker duration in the field. This reduced construction time automatically lowers labor wage costs due to a drop in the man-hours index. Technically, applying simple exposed brick is not only effective in cutting construction budgets, but also accelerates the overall project completion schedule. This concept holds strong potential to serve as an alternative standard for residential or commercial building construction featuring an industrial-minimalist style in Palopo City, providing a solution that is economical, fast, and high in aesthetic value.
Analisis Perbandingan Rab Penggunaan Bata Merah Dan Bata Ringan (Hebel) Pada Rumah Tinggal Sederhana Tipe 36 (Studi Kasus Kota Palopo) Noviana Noviana; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1949

Abstract

Resource management and the selection of appropriate wall materials in the construction of simple type 36 residential houses play a crucial role in achieving cost efficiency without compromising building quality and structural standards. Wall masonry is one of the non-structural components with the largest work volume, absorbing a significant portion of the total budget. This study aims to analyze and compare the Budget Plan (RAB) and cost efficiency between conventional red brick and modern lightweight aerated concrete brick (Hebel) in the construction of a simple type 36 residential house in Palopo City, South Sulawesi. The research method applied is descriptive quantitative comparative analysis through field observations and mathematical calculations of net wall volume, Unit Price Analysis of Work (AHSP) based on local standards and material availability, as well as the total cost recapitulation of both materials. Based on the floor plan analysis, a net wall volume of  was obtained (after deducting  for door and window openings). The results of the unit price analysis (AHSP) per  showed that red brick masonry work costs IDR 153,830.00, whereas lightweight brick masonry costs IDR 116,230.00. In terms of total execution cost, wall work using red brick requires a budget of IDR 13,844,700.00, while converting to lightweight brick requires IDR 10,460,700.00. The application of lightweight brick (Hebel) is proven to generate cost savings of IDR 3,384,000.00, which corresponds to a budget efficiency of 24.44%. The primary factors driving the high efficiency of lightweight bricks are the lower labor coefficient due to precise block dimensions, faster installation times, and reduced adhesive material consumption using thin-bed mortar cement ( ). Therefore, lightweight brick (Hebel) is highly recommended as the most economical and optimal wall material choice for property developers and self-build communities in Palopo City.    
Perhitungan Efisiensi Biaya Pekerjaan Langit-Langit: Plafon Triplek vs Plafon GRC Putri Rahayu *Utti; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1958

Abstract

Pekerjaan langit-langit (plafon) memegang peranan krusialdalam estetika arsitektural, kenyamanan termal, sertaefisiensi biaya pada proyek konstruksi bangunan gedung. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbandinganefisiensi biaya secara mendalam antara penggunaan PlafonTriplek dan Plafon Glassfiber Reinforced Cement (GRC) berdasarkan harga material dan upah kerja lokal di Kota Palopo, Sulawesi Selatan tahun 2026. Metode penelitianmenggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif berbasis Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan (AHSP) SNI/PUPR 2023 yang disesuaikandengan survei harga pasar dan observasi produktivitaslapangan pada tiga lokasi pembangunan rumah tinggal di Palopo. Perhitungan mencakup biaya bahan, upah tenagakerja, dan rangka pendukung (rangka kayu vs. rangka besihollow galvalum). Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa hargasatuan pekerjaan plafon triplek tebal 4 mm rangka kayu50x50 cm adalah sebesar Rp 118.750 / m², sedangkan plafonGRC tebal 4 mm rangka hollow galvalum sebesar Rp 142.300 / m², yang menunjukkan selisih biaya awal sebesar19,83% lebih mahal untuk GRC. Namun, ditinjau dari IndeksNilai Ekonomi (EVI) jangka panjang yang memperhitungkandaya tahan terhadap air dan risiko kebakaran, plafon GRC jauh lebih efisien hingga 27,41% dalam siklus hidup 15 tahun. Penulisan ini menyajikan rumusan matematis lengkap, analisis RAB rinci, serta rekomendasi teknis bagi praktisikonstruksi di wilayah Kota Palopo.
Estimasi Biaya Pembangunan Rumah Sederhana Dengan Metode Komparasi Rangka Atap Kayu Vs Baja Ringan (Studi Kasus: Luwu) Putri Rahayu; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1964

Abstract

With advancements in construction technology and the increasing scarcity of high-quality timber, selecting alternative materials for building roof trusses has become crucial. The scarcity of timber has made it difficult to procure and relatively expensive, leading to the widespread adoption of cold-formed steel (light-gauge steel) as a substitute. This study aims to analyze cost estimates and construction time efficiency for roof truss structures in simple residential buildings by comparing timber and cold-formed steel in the Luwu Regency area. The research employs a quantitative comparative approach, calculating work volumes based on the geometric specifications of a case study model, analyzing labor productivity, and compiling a Budget Plan (RAB) that specifically references the latest (2026) Unit Price Analysis (AHSP) indices and Indonesian National Standard (SNI) loading standards. The comparative results indicate that, in terms of structural strength and tensile quality, cold-formed steel exhibits more uniform and consistent performance than timber. Economically, although cold-formed steel may require additional bracing in large-span structures due to lower flexural rigidity, the total installation cost for roof trusses in standard residential buildings is lower and more economical than that of timber. Furthermore, regarding time efficiency, the installation of cold-formed steel roof trusses is significantly faster and requires less labor than conventional timber trusses. The use of cold-formed steel also offers technical advantages, such as termite resistance and non-flammability, while being more environmentally friendly by supporting forest conservation.  
Analisis Perbandingan Upah Borongan Vs Upah Harian Tenaga Kerja Dalam Penyusunan Rab Rumah Sederhana (Studi Kasus : Belopa) Raznilawati Raznilawati; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1965

Abstract

The construction sector plays a vital role in infrastructure development and economic growth, where project success is highly influenced by the efficient management of cost, time, and quality. One of the largest and most dynamic cost components in project execution is labor wages. This study aims to analyze the comparison of labor costs and financial efficiency levels between the daily wage system and the piece-rate (wholesale) wage system in formulating the Cost Budget Plan (RAB) for a type 36 simple residential house. The case study was conducted on a housing project in Pammanu Village, North Belopa District, Luwu Regency, South Sulawesi, in 2026. The research method applied was descriptive quantitative with a comparative approach. The Analysis of Work Unit Price (AHSP) was formulated based on the latest official national technical regulations applied in 2026, namely the Circular Letter of the Director General of Construction Development Number 47/SE/Dk/2026 regarding Guidelines for Estimating Construction Project Costs, and adjusted to the 2026 local market prices and labor wage fluctuations in Luwu Regency. The financial data analysis revealed that the total pure labor cost under the daily wage scheme was Rp110,000,000, resulting in a total project RAB (including materials, equipment, and a 10% overhead and profit margin) of Rp412,500,000. Meanwhile, the piece-rate wage scheme required a pure labor cost of Rp125,000,000, leading to a total project RAB of Rp429,000,000. There was a nominal budget discrepancy of Rp16,500,000. Based on the economic efficiency formulation, the implementation of the daily wage system proved to be 3.84% more financially efficient than the piece-rate system. Nevertheless, field observations indicated that the piece-rate wage system offers a non-financial advantage in accelerating the project duration due to high worker productivity motivation. This study concludes that the selection of the wage system must be tailored to the project's main priorities: the daily wage method is optimal for cost efficiency (cost-oriented), whereas the piece-rate method is suitable for schedule acceleration (time-oriented).  
Estimasi Biaya Penggunaan Semen Instan (Mortar) Vs Semen Konvensional Pada Pekerjaan Dinding Rumah Sederhana (Studi Kasus : Luwu Timur) Nur Ainun; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1972

Abstract

Wall work is one of the components with the largest volume in the construction of a simple house which greatly affects the cost efficiency of the project. This study aims to compare the estimated cost of using instant cement (Mortar) with conventional cement (a mixture of Portland cement and sand) in the masonry and plastering work of the walls of a simple type 36 house in East Luwu Regency. A comparative descriptive quantitative approach based on the Work Unit Price Analysis (AHSP) of the Minister of PUPR Regulation, namely by transferring the real volume of the building to the basic price of materials available in East Luwu. The results of the analysis show that although the retail purchase price of instant cement (Mortar) per sack is more expensive, material consumption per square meter is much less and is able to reduce the labor wage coefficient due to the faster work duration. Accumulatively in a type 36 house with a wall volume of 92 m2, the use of instant cement (mortar) results in a total cost of Rp 10,115,400, while conventional cement is Rp 13,248,000. Thus, the use of instant cement provides a cost efficiency of 23.65% and minimizes material waste in the field.  
Analisis Estimasi Biaya Dan Efisiensi Penggunaan Semen Instan (Mortar) Vs Semen Konvensional Pada Pekerjaan Dinding Rumah Sederhana (Studi Kasus: (Palopo) Fitriani Fitriani; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1975

Abstract

Constructing a simple house requires efficient budget planning without compromising structural quality. Wall work is one of the components with the largest volume in house construction. This study aims to compare the direct cost estimates and time efficiency between the use of conventional cement (Portland Cement + Sand) and instant cement (mortar) for wall work (masonry, plastering, and finishing) per 1 m2. The analytical method used is a unit price analysis based on a standard approach in the field and adjusted standards. The results show that although the price of instant cement is higher per bag, its efficiency in terms of work speed, minimizing waste, and neatness of the final result make instant cement a very competitive alternative in terms of total actual construction costs in the field.