A Asdar
Cahaya Prima University

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE URGENCY OF 3 ROUNDS OF ELECTIONS IN 3 E (BUDGET EFFECTIVENESS, TIME EFFICIENCY, AND WORK PROGRAM EXECUTION) Maryam Salampessy; Zulkifli Ayub; Susilawati; Mohammad Sawir; A Asdar
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS (INJOSER)
Publisher : Adisam Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Researchers believe that one round of ELECTION can increase the effectiveness of the APBN, time efficiency, and widen the gap between the elected Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the Urgency of the Satu Putranan Election in 3 E (Budget Effectiveness, Time Efficiency, and Work Program Execution) (Manzilati, 2017) . This research is qualitative research with a descriptive approach, namely the urgency of the One Putranan Election Urgency in 3 E (Budget Effectiveness, Time Efficiency, and Work Program Execution). The data in this research was obtained from credible websites, books, journals and a number of other reliable sources. This data can also be called secondary data. The data in this research was analyzed using the stages of data collection, data selection, data reduction, and drawing conclusions. The research results show that first, implementing one round of ELECTIONS can save 14.4 trillion which is more effective if it is allocated to the education, religion, sports, economy and other sectors in need. Second, Carrying out one round of ELECTIONS can save time for approximately two months. The elected Presidential Candidates and Vice Presidential Candidates can maximize the use of this time to finalize their work programs and resolve a number of outstanding issues. Third, One round of ELECTIONS can be carried out directly without the 50% requirement by changing the ELECTION law.
Public Communication of the DPRD in the Implementation of Community Welfare Programs in Bulukumba Regency Asdar Asdar; Suprianto Suprianto; M Awaluddin; Muhammad Luthfi Siraj; Umar Iskandar
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v5i3.3444

Abstract

Public communication is an important element in governance because it affects public participation, policy legitimacy, and public accountability. However, the study of DPRD public communication in the entire cycle of implementing community welfare programs is still relatively limited. This study aims to analyze the public communication of the Bulukumba Regency DPRD at the planning, implementation, and reporting and evaluation stages of community welfare programs. The research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data was obtained through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation involving leaders and members of the DPRD, legislative bodies, related commissions, and other stakeholders. Data analysis uses the interactive model Miles, Huberman, and SaldaƱa which includes data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawn. The results of the study show that at the planning stage, public communication is carried out through recess, hearings, working visits, and public consultations that allow people's aspirations to be accommodated in regional policies, including Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning CSR. At the implementation stage, public communication functions as a means of coordination and supervision between the DPRD, local governments, OPDs, and the community. Meanwhile, at the reporting and evaluation stage, public communication is realized through the discussion of the APBD accountability report, evaluation of budget realization, and follow-up on audit results. This study concludes that DPRD public communication plays a role as a mechanism for absorbing aspirations, coordination, supervision, and accountability in realizing responsive, participatory, and accountable community welfare programs.