Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Jurnal Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Administrasi Negara
Saiful Risky
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Idea of Independent Judicial Ethics Courts in Indonesia: Gagasan Pengadilan Etik Kehakiman Independen Di Indonesia Dina Kartikasari; Saiful Risky
APHTN-HAN Vol 4 No 1 (2025): JAPHTN-HAN, January 2025
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55292/japhtnhan.v4i1.156

Abstract

This research was conducted to conceptually explore the urgency of the establishment and institutional pattern of the special ethical judicial institution of judicial power. This is driven by the growing global interest in state ethical practices, driven by the ineffectiveness of the law in maintaining public trust. Therefore, fostering and controlling the ideal behavior of judges is considered better through an ethical system, with the law as a last resort. This concept is reinforced by the idea of constitutional ethics, which is equivalent to constitutional law. Normative juridical research methods with legal and conceptual approaches are used in this study. The results of the analysis show that its development leads to the stage of functional ethics, namely the codification and positivization of ethics with the support of institutional infrastructure for its enforcement. The idea of a judicial ethics court strongly supports the strengthening of ethical institutions to build integrity in judges' behavior. The institutional construction of the ethics court must be in accordance with judicial principles in general and structurally the same as the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. However, it is possible that establishing an ethics court also has challenges that must also be considered.
Supremasi Sipil Vs. Supremasi Militer: Pejabat Pembantu Presiden Non-Kementerian dalam Bingkai Reformasi Konstitusi Saiful Risky; Dina Kartikasaari
Simbur Cahaya Volume 32 Nomor 1, Juni 2025
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v32i1.4900

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji secara kritis Peraturan Presiden No. 137 Tahun 2024 yang memberikan ruang bagi prajurit aktif Tentara Nasional Indonesia untuk menduduki jabatan pembantu Presiden non-kementerian. Analisis dilakukan dengan pendekatan interdisipliner, guna mengidentifikasi ambiguitas hukum yang timbul apabila produk hukum eksekutif tersebut bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang No. 34 Tahun 2004 tentang TNI dalam ranah normatif dan politik. Penelitian ini menyoroti konflik normatif—ketimpangan hukum—yang muncul berdasarkan prinsip hierarki norma, di mana peraturan presiden seharusnya tunduk pada undang-undang yang lebih tinggi, serta mengungkap potensi reaktivasi peran politik militer yang berpotensi menggoyahkan supremasi sipil dan reformasi militer pasca reformasi. Studi ini juga membandingkan mekanisme judicial review dan praktik pengawasan yudisial di beberapa negara demokratis, termasuk Amerika Serikat, Jerman, Korea Selatan, dan Taiwan. Dalam perbandingan ini, studi kasus seperti putusan Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) digunakan sebagai landasan dalam menegaskan pentingnya peran pengadilan sebagai alat kontrol atas perluasan kekuasaan militer. Perspektif perbandingan ini memperkuat argumentasi bahwa judicial review merupakan instrumen vital untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara kekuasaan sipil dan militer serta menegakkan supremasi konstitusional. Akhirnya, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keberadaan Perpres No. 137 Tahun 2024 tidak hanya menimbulkan persoalan hukum, melainkan juga mengindikasikan pergeseran paradigma politik hukum yang berisiko mengembalikan elemen-elemen otoritarianisme melalui legalisasi supremasi eksekutif. Oleh karena itu, penegakan hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan melalui intervensi yudisial dinilai krusial untuk memastikan bahwa setiap inovasi hukum terkait hubungan sipil-militer tetap sejalan dengan prinsip negara hukum demokratis dan semangat reformasi.
PRESIDENTIAL POWER AND EXECUTIVE AGGRANDIZEMENT IN SHAPING THE CABINET Febriansyah Ramadhan; Saiful Risky
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v11i2.9233

Abstract

This article examines the President’s authority to determine the number of ministers and deputy ministers, which has the potential to result in an oversized cabinet that hinders oversight of the executive branch. Adopting a socio-legal approach that combines doctrinal analysis with the study of executive aggrandizement, this research maps the mechanisms through which normative flexibility enables the expansion of the cabinet. The main findings demonstrate that cabinet expansion through changes in the Law on State Ministries has operated at several levels as a means of consolidating executive power through political patronage, the politicization of the bureaucracy, and legal engineering. Cabinet expansion is not a new phenomenon in Indonesian political history; this pattern has recurred from the Old Order to the New Order era. Constitutional Court Decision No. 128/PUU-XXIII/2025 confirms that excessive Presidential power can hinder bureaucratic effectiveness and efficiency. The decision also strengthens claims of executive aggrandizement not only in the ministerial sector but also among deputy ministers. This article proposes restricting Presidential power, particularly in determining cabinet size, through constitutional regulation with clear quantitative limits. Clearly defined boundaries that are difficult to modify politically would provide an effective mechanism to restrain the President’s authority to expand the cabinet.
Co-Authors Dina Kartikasaari Dina Kartikasari Febriansyah Ramadhan