Ariyanti
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen pada Penggunaan Coil Vape yang Tidak Sesuai dengan Standar Kesehatan Edgar Rahmantyo; Wika Yudha Shanty; Ariyanti; Fathor Rahman
Bhirawa Law Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Mei 2026
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of electronic cigarettes (vapes) in Indonesia has been accompanied by the circulation of supporting components, including vape coils, which are widely sold separately and often without adequate information regarding materials, safety, or legal compliance. This situation creates potential health and economic harms for consumers and raises legal protection issues because specific regulations governing coils remain unclear. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The findings indicate that consumer protection may be grounded in the right to safety and information, and business liability may be assessed through contractual liability, product liability, and defect-based liability (design, manufacturing, warning/information defects) across the distribution chain.
Implementasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 46 Tahun 2025 ( Studi di Lingkungan Kejaksaan Cianjur) Dhanitya Putra Prawira; Ariyanti
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 46 of 2025 as an amendment to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning government procurement of goods/services at the Cianjur District Attorney's Office and to identify obstacles that arise in its law enforcement. The study uses a qualitative method with an empirical approach through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies, with a theoretical basis of legal effectiveness, legality theory, criminal liability theory, and law enforcement theory. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of Presidential Regulation 46 of 2025 has been carried out formally through the establishment of Commitment Making Officers, Procurement Officers, and Selection Working Groups, as well as the utilization of the Electronic Procurement System. However, implementation has been suboptimal due to ongoing procurement delays, irregular documentation, limited resources, and minimal training related to the latest regulations. Obstacles to law enforcement include unclear boundaries between administrative and criminal errors, officials' concerns about the risk of criminalization, weak preventive oversight, and a lack of understanding of new procedures. The study concluded that the effectiveness of the Presidential Regulation's implementation remains limited to administrative compliance and has not achieved the substantive goals of efficiency, transparency, and accountability. Clearer technical guidelines, strengthened oversight, increased human resource capacity, and legal protection for officials acting in good faith are needed.