Yevendri Yevendri
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peranan PPAT Dalam Pendaftaraan Tanah Ulayat Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah Yevendri Yevendri; Dwikornida Dwikornida
Normative Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 13 No 1 (2025): Normatve: jurnal ilmiah hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tamansiswa Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Land has a very important meaning and role for human life, because everyone needs land during their life until they die and considering the structure of life and the economic pattern of the majority of which is still agrarian and as a country with an agrarian system, land is a very suitable and complex livelihood for each person to achieve prosperity in various fields, where the land itself is also the basic capital in the development of a nation and its benefits must be managed as well as possible including customary land, namely rights that are inherent as a special competence in customary law communities, in the form of authority/power to manage and regulate land and its contents with internal and external validity. In connection with the ownership of rights to customary land, UUPA regulates land registration which aims to provide legal certainty as regulated in Article 19 which reads, "To guarantee legal certainty, the Government shall carry out land registration throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia according to the provisions regulated by Government Regulations". The Government Regulation in question is Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. In Article 37 number (1) of Government Regulation No. Law No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration states: "The transfer of land rights and ownership rights to apartment units through sale, exchange, gift, investment in a company, and other legal acts of transfer of rights, except for transfer of rights through auction, may only be registered if granted by a deed drawn up by an authorized Land Deed Official (PPAT) in accordance with applicable laws." According to Article 1, number 24 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, a Land Deed Official (PPAT), hereinafter referred to as PPAT, is a public official authorized to draw up certain land deeds. Given the importance of PPAT, it is fundamentally closely related to legal acts concerning land rights. To prove legal acts concerning land rights, an authentic deed is required. A public official is someone who carries out some of the public functions of the state, particularly in the field of civil law. The public official referred to above is the PPAT.
Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dana Pihak Ketiga Di Perbankan Yevendri Yevendri
Normative Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 14 No 1 (2026): Normative: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tamansiswa Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In an effort to collect funds, banks must recognize the sources of funds that exist in various levels of society in different forms. One of them is third party funds. These funds must be managed well, because they are temporary and must be returned, meaning that the bank as the holder of third party funds must be responsible for the safety of these third party funds. However, incident after incident has befallen the existence of these third party funds, one of which is the occurrence of a criminal act of embezzlement of third party funds committed by the defendant with the initials HAW, an employee of the BRI Watampone Branch, who was examined and tried by the Watampone District Court in Watampone, in Decision Number 387 / Pid.B / 2012 / PN.Wtp. which stated that the defendant with the initials HAW was guilty of committing the crime of "Embezzlement in His Position or Work" as regulated in Article 374 of the Criminal Code. The declaration of the defendant, identified as HAW, as the perpetrator of the crime of embezzlement of third-party funds and the sentence of four years' imprisonment minus the time served in detention, is inseparable from the acceptance of corporations as subjects of criminal law, which has brought about significant changes in the definition of criminal actors and raised issues regarding corporate criminal liability. In declaring the defendant, identified as HAW, as the perpetrator of the crime of embezzlement of third-party funds and sentencing him to four years' imprisonment minus the time served in detention, the system and theory of corporate criminal liability were applied, with management as the responsible creator and administrator, supported by identification theory and functional actor theory.