<![CDATA[This study aims to revisit the philosophical meaning of Hidop Orang Basudara in the context of Maluku's diverse society using Emmanuel Levinas' perspective of ethical responsibility. This study stems from the increase in intolerance and communal conflict in Maluku, which indicates a weakening of the philosophical practice of Hidop Orang Basudara, which has been interpreted more ceremonially than manifested in social practice. This study uses a descriptive-analytical qualitative method with a literature study and comparative-conceptual analysis approach to connect Levinas' ethical concepts with the values of Hidop Orang Basudara. The results of the study show that both concepts have common ground in affirming relational values, respect for the dignity of others, and rejection of egoism and exclusivism. However, there are fundamental differences in the structure of the relationship. Levinas emphasizes asymmetrical responsibility that precedes social relations, while Hidop Orang Basudara assumes symmetrical, reciprocal relations within the community. This analysis reveals that Levinas' perspective can enrich the understanding of Hidop Orang Basudara by emphasizing the dimension of unconditional responsibility towards "The Other," so that the concept of brotherhood is not only practiced ceremonially, but manifested in concrete ethical actions. This study concludes that the integration of local values and Levinasian ethics can offer a more profound ethical framework for pluralistic societies, while also opening up opportunities for further study in the contexts of education, community development, and conflict resolution.]]>
