Mompang L Panggabean
Faculty of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Analysis of the Ammar Zoni Case: A Restorative and Collaborative Justice Perspective Steven Abednego Panggabean; Mompang L Panggabean; Rospita Adelina Siregar
Bacarita Law Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2026): April (2026) BACARITA Law Journal
Publisher : Programs Study Outside the Main Campus in Law Pattimura University ARU Islands Regency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/bacarita.v6i2.24512

Abstract

This article examines the legal controversy surrounding the Ammar Zoni narcotics case through the perspectives of Restorative Justice and Collaborative Justice. As a public figure, his case generated extensive debate regarding the appropriateness of alternative justice mechanisms, particularly in relation to recidivism, systemic integrity, and the role of offenders in exposing broader institutional misconduct. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal feasibility of applying Restorative Justice and Justice Collaborator mechanisms in the Ammar Zoni case. Specifically, it aims to assess whether these approaches can be legitimately employed in cases involving repeated offenses, public figures, and allegations of systemic corruption within law enforcement institutions. This research adopts a normative juridical method using a doctrinal legal approach. It relies on statutory analysis, case-based reasoning, and conceptual interpretation of restorative and collaborative justice principles. Primary legal materials, judicial practices, and scholarly literature are examined to evaluate the legal standards governing the application of Justice Collaborator status and restorative mechanisms in Indonesia. The findings demonstrate that the application of Restorative Justice in this case is legally untenable due to recidivism and the gravity of the offense. Conversely, Justice Collaborator status remains conditionally viable, depending on verifiable contributions. This study introduces a novel perspective by framing collaborative justice as a potential instrument for exposing systemic wrongdoing within law enforcement institutions.
Reconstruction of Online Gambling Law Enforcement: Symptoms of Decriminalization or Manifestations of Restorative Justice Yuni Astriana; Mompang L Panggabean; Rospita Adelina Siregar
LUTUR Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 1 May (2026): LUTUR Law Journal
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Diluar Kampus Utama Universitas Pattimura Kabupaten Maluku Barat Daya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/lutur.v7i1.24542

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal implications due to the revocation of the norm of the criminal threat of online gambling in Article 45 paragraph (3) of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law through Law Number 1 of 2024. The legal gap between the ban that remains in effect and the sanctions that are removed raises law enforcement problems. The research method uses a normative juridical approach, this study examines the status of decriminalization and the prosecution transition strategy based on the principles of lex specialis derogat legi generali and lex favor rei. The results of the study show that the revocation cannot be interpreted as decriminalization, because the substance of the gambling ban is still regulated in the Criminal Code. The solution to handling cases, both existing and new, is to transfer the legal basis to Articles 426 and 427 of the Criminal Code. The technical strategy involves coordinating law enforcement and issuing the Minutes of Delik Adjustment to ensure legal certainty and justice during the transition period.