Yudha Sri Wulandari
Universitas Kutai Kertanegara, Tenggarong, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

NAFKAH MADHIYAH ANAK PASCA PERCERAIAN: STUDI KOMPARATIF HUKUM PERDATA DAN HUKUM ISLAM DI INDONESIA Yudha Sri Wulandari
The Juris Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v10i1.2246

Abstract

This study examines the normative construction of post-divorce child maintenance in two legal systems that apply in Indonesia, namely civil law (KUHPerdata) applied by the District Court and Islamic law (Compilation of Islamic Law) applied by the Religious Court. The method used is a comparative juridical-normative approach with a legislative, conceptual, comparative law, and case approach to the 2020–2024 verdict. The results of the study show two findings. First, both legal systems place child support obligations as an inherent obligation on parents, especially fathers, and are not erased by divorce (Pasal 298 KUHPerdata; Pasal 156 huruf d KHI; Pasal 41 UU Perkawinan). Second, the difference lies in the theoretical doctrine, namely civil law constructs it as an inherent and reciprocal alimentatieplicht, while Islamic law discusses it through the doctrine of lil-intifa' versus lit-tamlik which had been the basis for the rejection of the lawsuit in the Decision MA No. 608 K/AG/2003, before being reconstructed through SEMA No. 2 Tahun 2019.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA: TANTANGAN DALAM IMPLEMENTASI Yudha Sri Wulandari; Rismansyah
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i2.1888

Abstract

Technological developments have encouraged the rapid growth of electronic transactions (e-commerce) in Indonesia. However, this convenience also raises vulnerabilities for consumers related to fraud, quality of goods, data confidentiality, and puts consumers in a weak bargaining position. This study aims to analyze the legal framework that protects e-commerce consumers in Indonesia, highlight implementation challenges, and identify effective solutions. This research uses normative legal research methods with legislative and conceptual approaches. The results show that primary legal protection is sourced from Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK) and Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE Law), but there are still regulatory gaps and weaknesses in law enforcement. The main gap is the absence of substantial affirmation of civil liability for marketplace platforms that factually play an active role and make a profit. Conceptually, this condition demands the adoption of the doctrine of shared responsibility between the platform and the merchant. In addition, the dispute resolution mechanism through the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) has proven to be ineffective due to execution constraints and spatial jurisdictional limitations. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is needed to explicitly define the Shared Liability platform, strengthen the government's institutional capacity for data security audits, and an urgent transition towards the implementation of the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) system as a fast and efficient dispute resolution mechanism. These measures are crucial to achieve optimal protection and legal certainty in digital dynamics.