Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Andreas Eno Tirtakusuma
Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The Use of Artificial Intelligence by Judges in Adjudicating Cases Andreas Eno Tirtakusuma; Eleazar Josiah Tirtakusuma
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (May - Jun
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i2.870

Abstract

The increasingly massive development of artificial intelligence has touched the judicial sphere and raised fundamental questions about how the law should respond. This article examines the relationship among judges, the law, and artificial intelligence through normative studies, using statutory and conceptual approaches, combined with a sociolegal approach grounded in Social Construction Theory, especially the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT). The study's results indicate that artificial intelligence technology is not a neutral, stand-alone entity, but rather is shaped by the values, norms, and interests of the social actors interacting within it. In the judicial context, judges, as social actors, have an active role in shaping how technology is adopted and used, rather than simply being passive recipients of technological innovation. The Indonesian legal system still faces a significant gap in norms governing artificial intelligence in the judicial environment, necessitating a legal construction grounded in constitutional values ​​while being sensitive to the dynamics of the social construction of technology. Artificial intelligence should be positioned as an instrument that supports judges' capacity, not a substitute for judicial authority, accompanied by ethical oversight mechanisms, algorithmic accountability, and strengthened technological literacy for all judicial officials.
Co-Authors Eleazar Josiah Tirtakusuma