Sulthan Fadhil Hisyam
Jurusan Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia Melalui Studi Kasus Sengketa Himpurna Sulthan Fadhil Hisyam
Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026): Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah (Juni 2026)
Publisher : PT. Saha Kreasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64788/ar-rasyid.v2i6.393

Abstract

This study provides a critical appraisal of the legal safeguards governing the enforcement of transnational arbitral awards within the Indonesian jurisdiction, centered on the landmark dispute of Himpurna California Energy Ltd v. PT PLN. Utilizing a normative-juridical research framework with an emphasis on jurisprudential analysis and prevailing statutory structures, this inquiry examines the tension between Indonesia’s international obligations under the 1958 New York Convention and the practicalities of domestic judicial intervention. The findings indicate that the broad interpretative latitude applied to 'public policy' principles by local judicial authorities often functions as an anomaly that obstructs the execution of foreign arbitral mandates. Such unpredictability generates significant juridical risk for global investors and undermines the foundational independence of the arbitral forum. This paper advocates for a fundamental reorientation of the judicial paradigm toward a pro-arbitration stance and underscores the necessity of modernizing national arbitration regulations to bolster Indonesia's economic competitiveness within the global trade ecosystem.  
Analisis Yuridis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) Tanpa Pesangon dalam Perspektif Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Sulthan Fadhil Hisyam
Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026): Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Publikasi Penelitian Ilmiah (Juni 2026)
Publisher : PT. Saha Kreasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64788/ar-rasyid.v2i6.394

Abstract

This research provides a rigorous examination of the termination of employment policies that exempt employers from severance pay obligations under Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021. Within the framework of labor market liberalization introduced by the Job Creation Law, significant legal ambiguity has surfaced concerning the "urgent misconduct" criteria used to disqualify workers from receiving post-employment benefits. Employing a doctrinal legal research methodology with a focus on statutory interpretation and conceptual frameworks, this study investigates the repercussions of these norms on the constitutional safeguards for employees. The analysis reveals that the lack of an independent evidentiary process for verifying grave misconduct creates substantial opportunities for administrative malpractice and unilateral decision-making by employers. Consequently, this shift undermines the principles of social justice and legal certainty, transforming severance pay—originally designed as an economic safety net—into a punitive tool. The study concludes that rigid standardization of misconduct definitions and enhanced labor oversight are imperative to ensure that industrial competitiveness does not compromise the fundamental normative rights of the workforce.