Ali Yusuf Muzaki
Ma'had Aly Hasyim Asy'ari Tebuireng Jombang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reconstructing the Hadiths on the Obligation of Hajj: A Study of ʿIlal and Visa Quota Policies from the Perspective of Uṣūl al-Fiqh Ali Yusuf Muzaki; Zakaria; Muhammad Syafiiq; Ridwan; Ahmad 'ubaydi hasbillah
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 1 Februari 2026: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jipsi.v5i1.883

Abstract

This article aims to reconstruct the understanding of hadiths on the obligation of Hajj through the approaches of ʿilal al-Ḥadīth, and to analyse their implications for quota and visa regulations in the perspective of uṣūl al-fiqh. The hadiths concerning the obligation of Hajj essentially affirm a universal command for every Muslim who possesses the required capability (istiṭāʿah) to perform it once in a lifetime. However, in the contemporary context, the performance of Hajj faces various administrative regulations, such as quota restrictions imposed by the Saudi Arabian government and the requirement of visas as formal legal instruments. This study employs an integrative-qualitative design using both library research and field research, and applies three levels of analysis: fiqh al-Ḥadīth, ʿilal al-Ḥadīth, and naqd al-matn, alongside the uṣūl al-fiqh perspective related to taqyīd al-mubāḥ, maṣlaḥah mursalah, and the concept of istiṭāʿah. The findings indicate that quota and visa regulations do not contradict the substance of the hadiths on the obligation of Hajj; rather, they constitute a form of legal contextualisation aimed at safeguarding public interest, order, and the safety of pilgrims. Accordingly, the understanding of hadiths on the obligation of Hajj needs to be dynamically reconstructed so that it remains relevant to social realities and modern policy frameworks, without neglecting the authority of the hadith texts and the foundational principles of uṣūl al-fiqh.
Performing Qadhā Prayer on Behalf of the Deceased: Hadith Study and Jurisprudential Analysis of the Four Madhhabs Ali Yusuf Muzaki; Ahmad Mukhlish Sirojuddin; Hafidhul Mubarok; Ridwan; Muthohharun Afif
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 2 Mei 2026: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jipsi.v5i2.730

Abstract

This study investigates the Islamic jurisprudential status of prayers left unperformed (qadha shalat) by a deceased Muslim, combining rigorous hadith authentication (takhrij) with cross-madhhab legal comparison (muqaranah al-madzahib). The central question — whether a guardian (wali) may perform substitute prayers on behalf of the deceased by analogy with authenticated fasting-substitute hadiths — has generated sustained scholarly disagreement across the four Sunni schools. Drawing on primary classical sources and recent scholarship in Islamic law, including Scopus-indexed journals  and nationally accredited Indonesian journals , this article demonstrates that: (1) no explicit (sharih) sahih hadith authorizes qadha prayers by a guardian; (2) the juristic disagreement turns precisely on competing definitions of the legal cause ('illah) in the qiyas argument, not on the hadith texts themselves; and (3) the Hanbali dissenting position, though methodologically coherent, is based on an 'illah — "unpaid debt to God" (dayn Allah) — that the majority correctly identifies as too broad to sustain a valid analogy with prayers. The study contributes a technically precise ushul fiqh analysis of the qiyas structure, filling a gap in comparative Islamic law literature.