Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Venia Utami Keliat
PUI PT Business Law E-commerce, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Sumatera Utara, 20112, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pembatalan Merek dengan Persamaan pada Pokoknya: Kasus Gudang Garam VS Gudang Baru di Indonesia(Studi Putusan Nomor 4/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2021/PN Niaga Sby) Pilihan Fredrick Johannes Tanjung; Venia Utami Keliat
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.99-108

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of the principle of similarity in essential elements as a basis for trademark cancellation in a dispute involving prominent cigarette trademarks in Indonesia, in accordance with Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The research employed a normative juridical method using a case study approach centered on the decision of the Surabaya Commercial Court Number 4/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2021/PN Niaga Sby. The findings indicate that the judges adopted a substantive approach in assessing trademark similarity based on the overall impression created in the minds of consumers. Although the decision strengthens protection for trademark owners, the analysis reveals weaknesses in the juridical reasoning, as the parameters for visual, phonetic, and conceptual assessment were not explicitly formulated. This study concludes that there is a need for the standardization of assessment parameters by judges in order to create legal certainty for business actors in Indonesia.
Analisis Hukum terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual yang Dilakukan Anak Sebagai Pelaku terhadap Anak sebagai Korban (Studi Putusan Nomor: 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/Pn. Sbs.) Dandy Leonardus Tarigan; Venia Utami Keliat
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.2.2026.363-373

Abstract

Sexual violence involving children as both perpetrators and victims presents a complex legal issue because it requires balancing victim protection with the rehabilitation of child offenders. This study aims to examine the legal regulation of sanctions for sexual violence under Indonesian child protection law and to analyze the judicial reasoning in Decision Number 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Sbs. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of legislation on child protection, the juvenile criminal justice system, the Criminal Code, and the selected court decision, supported by secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data were analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and deductive legal reasoning. The findings indicate that Indonesian law distinguishes sanctions for adult and juvenile offenders. Adult perpetrators are subject to imprisonment of five to fifteen years and fines of up to IDR 5 billion under the Child Protection Law. In contrast, juvenile offenders are sentenced under the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which emphasizes restorative justice, rehabilitation, diversion, and reduced sentencing. In Decision Number 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Sbs, the court found that all elements of the offense had been proven and imposed a sentence of ten months’ imprisonment and six months of vocational training after considering the offender’s age, the psychological impact on the victim, and the principles of justice, legal certainty, and child protection. The study concludes that judicial decisions involving juvenile sexual offenders should maintain a balance between accountability, victim protection, and the best interests of the child.
Co-Authors Dandy Leonardus Tarigan Pilihan Fredrick Johannes Tanjung