Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF WORKING FACILITIES AS A MODERATING FACTOR FOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT UTILIZING THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR TOWARD ACCOUNT OFFICERS’ INTENTION TO STAY IN INDONESIAN SHARIA BANKING UNDER THE GRAMEEN MODEL Dian Heryanti Handayani; Rida Amanda; Anggun Laela Wulandari; Ario Setra Setiadi
International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19362535

Abstract

This study investigates the determinant factors affecting the intention to stay among Account Officers at Indonesia's sole sharia bank employing the Grameen model to serve underprivileged women. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), it analyzes the influence of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control on retention intentions while evaluating the moderating role of compensation and benefits, particularly working facilities. Data were gathered via a structured survey and analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the measurement model and structural relationships. Results indicate that all three TPB constructs significantly predict intention to stay, with perceived behavioral control emerging as the strongest factor. This underscores that Account Officers' confidence in managing job demands is pivotal to their retention decisions. However, compensation and benefits did not moderate these relationships, implying that in mission-driven roles like microfinance, financial incentives do not substantially influence the psychological and social drivers of sustained employment. These findings extend TPB's application to sharia microfinance banking, providing empirical insights into retention in community-oriented jobs. They highlight the importance of bolstering psychological support, supervision, and social ties as more effective retention strategies than compensation alone.
Navigating Freedom of Speech in Social Media: Reconstruction of the Crime of Defamation in the Era of the New Criminal Code and Its Implications for Freedom of Expression on Social Media Ario Setra Setiadi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.2.2026.233-260

Abstract

The rapid expansion of social media has transformed Indonesia’s public communication environment, enabling broader civic participation while simultaneously generating new legal challenges related to online defamation and digital expression. Within this evolving digital public sphere, the application of criminal defamation provisions, particularly Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) and defamation provisions within the Criminal Code, has generated significant controversy due to concerns regarding overcriminalization, legal ambiguity, and chilling effects on democratic discourse. This study reassesses the coherence and proportionality of Indonesia’s legal framework governing online defamation and freedom of expression in social media environments, with specific attention to Article 433 of the new Indonesian Criminal Code and the transitional regime under Law No. 1 of 2024 on the second amendment to the ITE Law. Employing a normative juridical approach supported by legislative, conceptual, case, and comparative legal analyses, the research draws on constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, judicial decisions, and international human rights instruments. The findings reveal structural problems in the current framework, including vague statutory definitions, overlapping norms between the ITE Law and the new Criminal Code, inconsistent law enforcement practices, and limited digital forensic capacity, which collectively foster overcriminalization and a chilling effect on legitimate digital expression. To address these challenges, the study proposes the Digital Expression Regulation Framework (DERF), a multidimensional model integrating digital rights, user behavior, legal boundaries, and enforcement mechanisms to balance reputational protection with democratic freedom of expression in Indonesia’s evolving digital public sphere.