<![CDATA[The development of industrial relations is directed toward achieving a coherent alignment of interests within the employment system. Nevertheless, termination of employment (dismissal) continues to generate significant tension, primarily due to legal uncertainty, differing normative interpretations, and inconsistent judicial rulings This study examines the regulatory disharmony of termination of employment from both vertical and horizontal dimensions, while also proposing a model of legal harmonization grounded in legal certainty and justice. The present study adopts a normative legal framework, employing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches as core analytical instruments. to explore legal issues in a structured and comprehensive manner The study further evaluates labor regulations alongside judicial practices, particularly decisions issued by the Industrial Relations Court, which serve not only as instruments of dispute settlement but also as manifestations of the practical realization of legal norms within the legal system. The findings reveal that regulatory inconsistency stems from overlapping provisions, unclear procedural frameworks, and variations in judicial interpretation, all of which contribute to inconsistent outcomes in court decisions. Accordingly, this research proposes an integrated legal harmonization model for termination of employment that combines legal certainty, justice, and a balanced configuration of interests within a unified legal system, in order to promote sustainable industrial relations]]>
