This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Pelita
Syukron Abdul Kadir Kadir
Universitas Widya Mataram, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Delik Aduan dalam Perzinaan dan Kohabitasi sebagai Batas Intervensi Negara terhadap Ranah Privat Syukron Abdul Kadir Kadir; Edy Chrisjanto; Suyikati Suyikati
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2026
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v7i1.7348

Abstract

The revision of national criminal law through the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code includes provisions on adultery and cohabitation in Articles 411 and 412 as absolute offences. This regulation is intended as a compromise between the protection of moral values and restrictions on state intervention in the private sphere. However, the criminalisation of personal relationships between adults has sparked debate about the limits of the state's legitimacy in interfering in private life, especially when criminal law ideally functions as an ultimum remedium and is only used to prevent real public harm. This study is a normative legal study with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that although absolute complaint offences limit law enforcement initiatives to certain parties, criminal status still opens up the potential for state intervention after a complaint is filed. Within the framework of the harm principle, consensual cohabitation relationships are difficult to qualify as acts that cause concrete public harm. Furthermore, based on the principle of proportionality, criminalisation must have a legitimate, necessary and balanced purpose in relation to the restrictions on rights that it imposes. Without proof of a significant social impact, criminalisation has the potential to become a form of over-criminalisation that is not fully in line with the protection of the right to privacy in a democratic state governed by the rule of law