Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Integration of Traditional and Modern Islamic Educational Thought in Contemporary Islamic Education Melani Hamid; Amelia Mustafa T Husein; Sahdjad M Aksan; Muhdi Alhadar
Ahlussunnah: Journal of Islamic Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : STIT Ahlussunnah Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58485/jie.v5i1.629

Abstract

Islamic education faces challenges in bridging the dichotomy between traditional approaches oriented toward moral and spiritual formation and modern approaches emphasizing rationality and adaptation to social change. This study aims to comparatively analyze traditional Islamic educational thought as represented by Al-Ghazali and Ibn Khaldun, and modern Islamic educational thought as represented by Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas and Fazlur Rahman, while exploring their relevance to the development of contemporary Islamic education. This study employed a qualitative approach using conceptual and comparative content analysis of the major works of these scholars. The findings reveal that the traditional paradigm emphasizes the cultivation of adab, spiritual development, and the formation of the insan kamil (the complete human being), whereas the modern paradigm highlights rationality, contextual reinterpretation, and the integration of knowledge. The study further demonstrates that these two paradigms are not inherently contradictory but rather complementary in constructing a holistic framework for Islamic education. Their synthesis results in an integrative approach that combines spiritual formation with methodological flexibility to address the challenges of education in the digital era. This approach is particularly relevant for the development of integrated curricula, the utilization of educational technology while preserving Islamic values, and the holistic character development of learners. Theoretically, this study enriches the discourse on Islamic educational philosophy, while practically providing a conceptual foundation for the development of more adaptive and sustainable Islamic educational policies and practices.
Stagnation of Mobile Court Services and Access to Justice in Remote Island Communities: Evidence from the Religious Court of Labuha, Indonesia Mujaidin La Tua; Muhammad Ar. Husain; Muhdi Alhadar
Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics
Publisher : ANTMIND YOUTH EMPOWER FOUNDATION

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63077/s1dsj1

Abstract

Access to justice remains a major challenge for communities living in remote and geographically isolated regions, particularly in archipelagic states such as Indonesia. Mobile court services (sidang keliling) have been established as a judicial outreach mechanism to improve access to legal services for marginalized populations. This study examines the stagnation of mobile court implementation at the Religious Court of Labuha and its impact on the resolution of Islamic family law cases in Pulau Taliabu Regency. Using a qualitative socio-legal research approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with judges, court officials, and officers of the Office of Religious Affairs, supported by field observations and analysis of institutional documents and case records. The findings show that mobile court services in Pulau Taliabu were effectively inactive between 2018 and 2022 due to limited judicial personnel, weak inter-institutional coordination, budgetary constraints, and geographical barriers. This stagnation resulted in the accumulation of family law cases, particularly divorce and marriage legalization (isbat nikah), thereby restricting procedural efficiency and substantive access to justice for local communities. The study further demonstrates that the resumption of mobile court services in early 2023 significantly improved case resolution and legal accessibility. Normatively, these findings underscore the relevance of maṣlaḥah mursalah as an ethical-legal framework that emphasizes public benefit, harm prevention, and judicial accessibility. This article contributes to the broader discourse on access to justice and judicial reform by highlighting the importance of sustainable mobile court mechanisms for remote island communities.