Muhammad Nuzul Abraar
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

POLITICAL PARTY LEGITIMACY IN THE QUR’AN: A TAFSĪR AḤKĀM ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA’S CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL SYSTEM Makmunzir Mukhtar; Aban Al-Hafi; Muhammad Nuzul Abraar; Muhammad Ainun Sholeh W. Hasyim
Malikussaleh Social and Political Reviews Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Master Program of Sociology, Universitas Malikussaleh,

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/mspr.v7i1.26716

Abstract

This study aims to examine the normative legitimacy of political parties from a Qur’anic perspective by analyzing Qur’anic political-ethical principles and their relevance to Indonesia’s party system. Employing a qualitative approach based on library research with a descriptive–analytical design, this study draws primarily on Qur’anic verses related to amānah (trust), justice (‘adl), deliberation (shūrā), amr ma‘rūf nahy munkar (enjoining good and preventing wrongdoing), and social unity (al-waḥdah). These verses are analyzed through classical and contemporary tafsīr aḥkām, particularly the works of al-Ṭabarī, al-Qurṭubī, and ‘Alī aṣ-Ṣābūnī. Data are examined using qualitative content analysis to identify dominant normative themes, trace interpretive patterns, and inductively relate them to the functional roles and institutional practices of political parties within Indonesia’s democratic system. The findings indicate that the Qur’an neither legitimizes nor delegitimizes political parties on the basis of their formal institutional structure, but rather on the extent to which they operationalize Qur’anic ethical principles in the exercise of political power. Accordingly, the normative legitimacy of political parties in the Qur’anic perspective is functional and conditional, contingent upon their commitment to substantive justice, public accountability, deliberative participation, and collective public welfare in governance.
Explaining Qur’anic Verse Selection in the State Funeral of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei through Revelatory Situation Matching Muhammad Nuzul Abraar; An-Nurrahmi; M. Haris Syahputra
Jurnal Ilmiah Guru Madrasah Vol 5 No 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : LaKaspia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69548/jigm.v5i1.128

Abstract

The recitation of different Qur’anic verses for foreign delegations at Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s state funeral prompted speculation that Iran was conveying hidden diplomatic messages through selective verse assignment. This study asks how verse selection for each delegation can be explained beyond ad hoc political signalling, and proposes Revelatory Situation Matching as an analytical mechanism for this purpose. Using a qualitative case study design, it examines twenty delegation–verse pairs drawn from approximately nine hours of official livestream footage. Historical revelatory situations were reconstructed from al-Wāḥidī’s Asbāb al-Nuzūl and the tafsīr literature; contemporary ceremonial situations were reconstructed from audiovisual observation and international media reports. Both corpora were coded independently through open, axial, and selective coding. The findings show that verse selection did not function as personalised political messaging to individual states, but as structural correspondence between historical revelatory situations and contemporary diplomatic circumstances: the strongest correspondences appeared among delegations associated with the Axis of Resistance, while partner states showed more moderate correspondences. The study concludes that Revelatory Situation Matching extends the function of asbāb al-nuzūl beyond hermeneutics into an analytical tool for contemporary Qur’anic reception, while Qur’anic Framing denotes the communicative effect produced once matched verses are performed before a public audience. These findings constitute an analytical reconstruction based on observable ceremonial patterns rather than a direct verification of the organisers’ decision-making process.