Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law Science
Enjum Jumhana
Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal protection for aggrieved parties in electronic contracts (e-contracts) Enjum Jumhana; Harry Qurba
Journal of Law Science Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): January: Law Science
Publisher : Institute Of computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/jls.v8i1.6892

Abstract

The development of information technology has given rise to new forms of transactions through electronic contracts (e-contracts) that offer convenience and efficiency, but also pose potential losses for parties, especially consumers. This study aims to analyze the form of legal protection for parties who are harmed in the implementation of electronic contracts in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach, through a study of the Civil Code, Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE), and Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The theoretical basis used is the theory of legal protection from Philipus M. Hadjon and the theory of contractual justice according to John Rawls. The results of the study indicate that legal protection for parties who are harmed in electronic contracts can be provided through preventive and repressive mechanisms, including the right to obtain correct information, complaint mechanisms, and dispute resolution through judicial institutions or alternatives such as arbitration and online mediation. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening regulations and digital literacy so that the principle of good faith and balance of rights in electronic contracts can be effectively guaranteed.
A legal analysis of community rejection of the landfill designation policy in Bangkonol village, Koroncong district, from a criminal law perspective Enjum Jumhana; Sanniki Setia Perdani; Faturohman Faturohman; Muhammad Deni Latiful Khoir; Wahyudi Wahyudi
Journal of Law Science Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): July: Law Science
Publisher : Institute Of computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/jls.v8i3.7193

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of public rejection of the policy of establishing a Final Disposal Site (TPA) for waste in Bangkonol Village, Koroncong District, from a criminal law perspective. Public rejection arose in response to concerns about environmental and health impacts, as well as the lack of public involvement in the policy-making process. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory regulatory approach and a case study approach, supported by empirical data as a complement. The results of the study indicate that public rejection is essentially a form of public participation guaranteed by the legal system, but in practice it has the potential to result in criminal legal consequences if carried out in unlawful ways, such as destroying public facilities, obstructing government projects, or other anarchic actions. On the other hand, the government also has an obligation to ensure that the policies adopted have met the principles of legality, transparency, and justice, including the implementation of an environmental impact analysis (AMDAL) and outreach to affected communities. From a criminal law perspective, it is important to assess the elements of fault (mens rea) and unlawful acts (actus reus) in every act of rejection. Therefore, a balanced approach between law enforcement and the protection of community rights is needed to prevent excessive criminalization of citizens and encourage dialogical and just conflict resolution. This research is expected to contribute to the development of more responsive public policies oriented toward community interests.
Application of pancasila industrial relations to the settlement of industrial relations disputes: Field study at PT Parkland World Indonesia Pwi 2 Cikande Serang Yus Saparudin Syah; Ujang Hibar; Enjum Jumhana
Journal of Law Science Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): July: Law Science
Publisher : Institute Of computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/jls.v8i3.7314

Abstract

Industrial relations disputes remain a persistent challenge in Indonesia, often resulting from differences in the interpretation of workers’ rights, employers’ obligations, and the implementation of labor regulations. Although numerous studies have examined dispute resolution mechanisms from legal and procedural perspectives, limited research has explored the practical application of Pancasila values as a normative and ethical foundation for industrial relations at the enterprise level. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Pancasila principles in resolving industrial relations disputes at PT Parkland World Indonesia (PWI) 2 Cikande, Serang, and to evaluate their contribution to achieving harmonious, equitable, and sustainable labor relations. The research employed an empirical juridical approach using field research, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis involving company management, workers, and labor union representatives. The findings reveal that deliberation (musyawarah), consensus (mufakat), social justice, and mutual respect constitute the primary principles guiding bipartite negotiations before formal litigation, thereby reducing conflict escalation and fostering cooperative industrial relations. The novelty of this study lies in integrating Pancasila as both a constitutional legal foundation and a practical dispute-resolution framework within a manufacturing industry setting. These findings provide theoretical enrichment for Indonesian industrial relations law and offer practical recommendations for employers, labor unions, and policymakers to institutionalize Pancasila-based dispute resolution as a strategy for promoting industrial harmony and preventing prolonged labor conflicts.
Co-Authors Faturohman Faturohman Harry Qurba Muhammad Deni Latiful Khoir Sanniki Setia Perdani Ujang Hibar Wahyudi Wahyudi Yus Saparudin Syah