Agung Nugroho Reformis Santono
Universitas PTIQ Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penafsiran Al-Qur’an: Mencari Keseimbangan Antara Teks dan Konteks dalam Menafsirkan Al-Qur’an Agung Nugroho Reformis Santono; Anshori Anshori; Nginayaturrohmah Nginayaturrohmah
Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir di Nusantara Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Asosiasi Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir se-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32495/nun.v10i2.839

Abstract

Controversies surrounding the interpretation of Qur’anic verses through textual and contextual approaches have intensified, sparking intense debate among scholars, practitioners, and having widespread social implications. Interpretations that focus solely on the textual dimension, without considering the historical and sociocultural contexts, frequently lead to misunderstandings and may even be exploited by certain groups to justify extremist acts. Conversely, the contextual approach provides a more inclusive alternative by emphasizing the relevance of Qur’anic values to contemporary challenges, though it often faces criticism for allegedly compromising textual authenticity. This study aims to propose a synthesis of both approaches in order to achieve a more comprehensive and responsive understanding. Employing a library-based research method and critical analysis of pertinent literature on these two interpretive typologies, the findings indicate that integrating textual and contextual perspectives can prevent distorted interpretations, preserve textual authenticity, and simultaneously address social dynamics. As a result, the understanding of the Qur’an is no longer trapped in a rigid textual-contextual dichotomy but rather moves toward a more balanced and adaptive interpretation
Beyond Temporal Causality: Synthesizing al-Ghazālī and Ibn Rushd’s Concepts of Time in Light of Tawasul through Kalām Falsafī Agung Nugroho Reformis Santono; Achmad Ma’ruf Hidayatulloh; Sayyida Roychana Salma; Kurniawan Seno Aji
Aqlania Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32678/aqlania.v16i1.18

Abstract

This article explores the classical theological-philosophical debate between al-Ghazālī and Ibn Rushd regarding the eternity of the universe, time, and motion, focusing on the concepts of taqaddum zamānī (temporal precedence) and taqaddum rutbī (hierarchical precedence). While al-Ghazālī defends the temporal creation of the cosmos by divine will, Ibn Rushd maintains that the universe eternally exists in a hierarchical dependence on God. The study employs a kalām falsafī framework to critically reconstruct these opposing views and integrate them with the spiritual practice of tawasul, a living tradition in contemporary Muslim society that views time as an ontological continuum rather than a linear sequence. The article’s significant contribution is a philosophical-theological synthesis demonstrating how the metaphysical structures of time in Islamic thought can account for spiritual practices like tawasul, wherein the past remains active in shaping present and future realities. This approach avoids binary tensions between rationality and theology, and proposes a dialogical epistemology rooted in revelation and demonstrative logic. This study opens new pathways for philosophical discourse in Islamic studies by bridging metaphysical cosmology with lived religious traditions. It also highlights the need for further research into how concepts like taqaddum zamānī and rutbī can inform contemporary interpretations of time in quantum cosmology, mystical theology, and ritual theory.