Pudjijuniarto Pudjijuniarto
Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia.

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Data-Driven Analysis of Scoring Methods and Match Outcomes in Elite Men’s Indoor Hockey Ferdian Fathur Rahman; Achmad Widodo; Himawan Wismanadi; Taufiq Hidayat; Pudjijuniarto Pudjijuniarto; Heryanto Nur Muhammad
INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review 2027: Articles in Press
Publisher : INSPIRETECH GLOBAL INSIGHT & DPE Universitas Pahlawan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53905/inspiree.v8i01.191

Abstract

The  purpose  of  the study. Performance analysis has become an essential approach in modern sport science for identifying game-related indicators associated with competitive success. However, empirical evidence regarding scoring patterns and match outcomes in elite men’s indoor hockey remains limited, particularly within Southeast Asian competitions. This study aimed to analyze the association between dominant scoring methods and match outcomes in men’s indoor hockey during the 2025 SEA Games. Materials and methods. This study employed a quantitative observational design using a notational performance analysis approach. Match data were collected from official competition recordings and match statistics from the men’s indoor hockey tournament at the 2025 SEA Games. Scoring methods were categorized into field goals, penalty corners, and penalty strokes. Descriptive statistics were used to identify the frequency and distribution of scoring patterns, while Chi-square analysis was conducted to examine the association between scoring dominance categories and match outcomes. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. Results. The findings revealed that field goals were the most dominant scoring method throughout the tournament and were more frequently associated with winning teams compared with losing teams. Winning teams demonstrated higher scoring efficiency and greater offensive effectiveness, particularly in open-play situations. The Chi-square analysis indicated a significant association between scoring dominance categories and match outcomes, suggesting that scoring patterns play an important role in determining competitive success in elite indoor hockey. The mosaic plot visualization further demonstrated clear differences in scoring distributions between winning and losing teams. Conclusions. The study concludes that dominant scoring patterns, particularly field-goal effectiveness, are significantly associated with successful match outcomes in elite men’s indoor hockey. These findings provide valuable evidence for coaches and performance analysts in developing data-driven tactical strategies and contribute to the growing literature on sport analytics and performance analysis in indoor hockey.
Open-Play Dominance and Set-Play Efficiency in Men’s Indoor Hockey: Goal-Scoring Patterns at the 2025 SEA Games Ilham Wiranata Kusuma; Achmad Widodo; Himawan Wismanadi; Taufiq Hidayat; Pudjijuniarto Pudjijuniarto; Heryanto Nur Muhammad
INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review 2027: Articles in Press
Publisher : INSPIRETECH GLOBAL INSIGHT & DPE Universitas Pahlawan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53905/inspiree.v8i01.187

Abstract

The  purpose  of  the study. This study aimed to investigate and characterize the goal-scoring patterns exhibited in the men’s indoor hockey tournament at the 33rd Southeast Asian Games (SEA Games) 2025, held in Bangkok, Thailand. Specifically, the research sought to identify the predominant methods of goal creation, temporal distributions of goals within match periods, spatial zones of shot origin, and the relative contribution of set-piece situations to overall scoring outcomes. Materials and methods. A retrospective observational design employing systematic notational analysis was adopted. All thirteen matches of the men’s indoor hockey tournament were analyzed using official broadcast footage. A validated coding instrument was applied to classify each goal (N = 120) according to type of attack (open play, penalty corner, set piece), field zone of origin, temporal segment within each half, and player involvement. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests of independence, and frequency analyses were computed to examine distributional patterns and associations among variables. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa (κ ≥ 0.85). Results. Open-play attacks constituted the primary source of goals (58.3%), followed by penalty corners (26.7%) and other set pieces (15.0%). A statistically significant temporal clustering of goals was observed in the final ten minutes of each half (χ² = 14.82, p < .01), with 41.7% of all goals scored in these segments. Goals originating from the central corridor of the shooting circle were significantly more prevalent than those from lateral positions (p < .05). Teams that scored the first goal won 76.9% of their matches, and a significant positive association was found between the ratio of penalty corner conversion and final match outcome (χ² = 9.67, p < .01). Indonesia, the eventual gold medalist, exhibited the highest shooting efficiency and the most diversified attacking repertoire. Conclusions. Goal-scoring in men’s indoor hockey at the SEA Games 2025 was predominantly driven by open-play transitions and penalty corner efficiency. The temporal concentration of goals in late-half segments underscores the tactical importance of fitness-related endurance and strategic substitution management. These findings offer evidence-based insights for coaching staff, performance analysts, and national federations seeking to optimize tactical preparation for major regional and international indoor hockey competitions.
Predicting Match Success Through Scoring Efficiency in Elite Men’s Indoor Hockey: Field Goals Versus Penalty Corners Andrea Guntara Adi Very Sandrea; Achmad Widodo; Himawan Wismanadi; Taufiq Hidayat; Pudjijuniarto Pudjijuniarto; Heryanto Nur Muhammad
INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review 2026: INPRESS Issue 3 (May-Aug Accepted articles)
Publisher : INSPIRETECH GLOBAL INSIGHT & DPE Universitas Pahlawan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53905/inspiree.v7i03.186

Abstract

The  purpose  of  the study. Men’s indoor hockey is a high-intensity invasion sport in which goal-scoring efficiency serves as a critical determinant of competitive success. Despite the strategic importance of different scoring modes, comparative investigations examining the relative relationships between field goals, penalty corner goals, and match outcomes remain limited, particularly in Southeast Asian elite competitions. This study aimed to examine and compare the relationships between field goals, penalty corner goals, and team victories in men’s indoor hockey at the SEA Games 2025. Materials and methods. A quantitative observational design employing systematic notational analysis was applied to 26 team–match observations derived from 13 official matches involving five national teams. Match outcome was coded as win (1) or loss (0), while field goals and penalty corner goals served as independent variables. Descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk normality tests, Spearman’s rank correlation, Mann–Whitney U tests, and binary logistic regression were employed to analyze the data. Results. Field goals accounted for 60.0% of total goals (n = 72), while penalty corner goals contributed 40.0% (n = 48). Both scoring modes were significantly associated with match outcome; however, penalty corner goals exhibited a stronger correlation with victories (ρ = .788, p < .001) than field goals (ρ = .583, p = .002). The Mann–Whitney U test confirmed significantly higher scoring ranks for winning teams in both categories, with a larger separation observed for penalty corner goals (U = 11.00, Z = −3.94, p < .001). Logistic regression indicated that a one-goal increase in penalty corner goals was associated with a 12.09-fold increase in the odds of winning (Exp(B) = 12.09), compared with a 5.23-fold increase for field goals. The model explained 86% of the variance in match outcome (Nagelkerke R² = .86) with 88.5% classification accuracy. Conclusions. Although open-play goals provide the primary scoring volume, penalty corner efficiency plays a more decisive role in determining team victories in elite men’s indoor hockey. These findings offer evidence-based insights for tactical planning and training prioritization in competitive indoor hockey.