Taufiq Agus Siswagama
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Efficacy of Particulate versus Non-Particulate Corticosteroids as Adjuvants for Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial Erma Rosita; Taufiq Agus Siswagama; Rudy Vitraludyono; Buyung Hartiyo Laksono
Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/jacr.v7i1.853

Abstract

Introduction: Single-shot ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve blocks are the gold standard for distal lower limb analgesia but are limited by a finite duration, often necessitating adjuvants. While dexamethasone (non-particulate) is the standard of care, methylprednisolone (particulate) theoretically offers a depot effect for sustained release. This study aimed to determine if perineural methylprednisolone provides superior analgesic duration compared to dexamethasone. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 36 ASA I-III patients undergoing distal lower limb surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive 20 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine with either Dexamethasone 8 mg (Group D) or Methylprednisolone 40 mg (Group M). To ensure blinding, solutions were prepared by an independent pharmacist and administered via opaque syringes. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia (time to Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] greater than 3), analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-Rank tests. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption, rebound pain severity, and block onset time. The study was powered for superiority with a clinically significant difference of 4 hours. Results: Thirty-six patients completed the study. Demographic and surgical characteristics were comparable. The median duration of analgesia was 18.4 (SD 3.2) hours in Group D and 19.1 (SD 3.5) hours in Group M (p = 0.58; Log-Rank p = 0.61). Pain scores at 12, 24, and 48 hours showed no significant difference, with both groups demonstrating a floor effect due to multimodal analgesia (Median NRS less than 2). No adverse events, including neurotoxicity or infection, were observed. Conclusion: Perineural methylprednisolone failed to demonstrate superior analgesic duration compared to dexamethasone in this cohort. The theoretical depot advantage did not translate to clinical superiority, likely due to vascular clearance in the popliteal fossa. Given the comparable efficacy but superior safety profile of non-particulate agents, dexamethasone remains the preferred adjuvant. Methylprednisolone serves as a viable alternative only when non-particulate options are unavailable.
Determinants of Postoperative ICU Admission in the Elderly: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Elective Surgeries in Indonesia Alief Ilman Zaelany; Isngadi Isngadi; Taufiq Agus Siswagama; Buyung Hartiyo Laksono
Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/jacr.v6i2.809

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing global geriatric population presents significant challenges for surgical care, particularly regarding the allocation of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) resources. This study aimed to identify determinants of postoperative ICU admission among elderly patients in Indonesia, a setting with a rapidly aging demographic. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study across 15 Indonesian hospitals from February to April 2021. Patients aged ≥60 years undergoing elective surgery were enrolled via consecutive sampling. Data on patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and type of anesthesia (general vs. regional) were collected. The primary outcome was postoperative ICU admission. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors. Results: Of 893 patients enrolled, 18.8% required postoperative ICU admission. The final multivariate model revealed that a higher ASA physical status was the strongest predictor of ICU admission (Odds Ratio [OR] 4.13; 95% CI 2.88-5.92; p < 0.001). The administration of general anesthesia was also independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of ICU admission compared to regional anesthesia (OR 2.77; 95% CI 1.83-4.19; p < 0.001). While the CCI was a significant factor in unadjusted analyses, its effect was attenuated after inclusion of the ASA score. Conclusion: ASA physical status and the choice of general anesthesia are powerful, independent determinants of postoperative ICU admission in the Indonesian geriatric surgical population. These findings highlight the critical role of preoperative physiological assessment and suggest that the choice of anesthetic technique has significant implications for postoperative resource needs.