Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Litigasi Amsir
Aburizal Fatwa Ramli
Fakultas Hukum Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementation of laws Tentang Peraturan Kepolisian No. 7 Tahun 2022 Tentang PTDH Dalam Rangka KEPP Salman Sahrir; Elvi Susanti Syam; Aburizal Fatwa Ramli; Muhammad Natsir
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 13 No 2 (2026): Februari
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the Role of the Police in enforcing the Code of Ethics of the Republic of Indonesia National Police at the Parepare Police Station who were convicted according to Police Regulation No. 7 of 2022 and the factors causing PTDH (Dishonorable Dismissal) against Police Members at the Parepare Police Station. This study uses a normative empirical research method with a legislative and social approach. The data sources used are primary and secondary data. Funding analysis will be conducted using a qualitative prescriptive approach. The results of this study are the Role of the Police in Enforcing the Code of Ethics of the Republic of Indonesia National Police at the Parepare Police Station, which is Criminalized According to Police Regulation Number 7 of 2022, is by serving complaints/reports related to violations by members of the National Police/PNS Polri, Organizational and Internal Security, Advocacy of leadership and service to the community, professional and proportional law enforcement by upholding Law and Human Rights and increasing internal consolidation in an effort to harmonize enforcement of regulations for police members and Factors Causing Dishonorable Dismissals Against the National Police at the Parepare Police Station because the police member in question has been proven to have committed a crime of narcotics abuse and also previously committed a crime of Domestic Violence (KDRT).
Membongkar Kejahatan Cukai: Pendekatan Kriminologis terhadap Praktik dan Penegakan Hukum Zurfian Adi Asma; Moch Alfatah Alti Putra; Iswandy Rani Saputra; Aburizal Fatwa Ramli; Armin Hasti
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 13 No 1 (2025): November
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines excise crime in Indonesia’s trade context by focusing on the circulation of illegal cigarettes without authorization in the jurisdiction of the Customs and Excise Supervision and Service Office Type Madya Pabean C Parepare. It aims to analyze the causes of illegal cigarette circulation and the forms of law enforcement carried out by the customs authority, using a combination of normative and empirical legal research with statutory and case approaches based on regulatory, literature, and field data. The results show that economic constraints, low legal awareness, broad supervisory areas with limited resources, high market demand for cheap cigarettes, and sanctions that lack a deterrent effect are the main driving factors, while law enforcement is implemented through reporting or in flagrante findings, investigation and sanctioning by Civil Servant Investigators, case file preparation, and submission to the Public Prosecutor under applicable criminal procedure and excise regulations
Restitusi bagi Korban Kekerasan Seksual Anak: Studi Komparatif Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia Setyawati Setyawati; Khairul Mannan; Fikry Fathurrahman; Muhammad Rafi Irwanzah; Aburizal Fatwa Ramli
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 13 No 3 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the protection of recovery rights for child victims of sexual violence in Indonesia and Malaysia through a normative and comparative analysis of the applicable legal frameworks. The research is motivated by the need to assess the extent to which the criminal justice systems in both countries not only punish offenders, but also guarantee restitution or compensation for victims and their families. It adopts a case study approach, focusing on the Natuna District Court decision in Indonesia and the Zara case in Malaysia, and is complemented by a doctrinal review of relevant legislation, including Indonesia’s Law on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS) 2022 and Supreme Court Regulation, as well as Malaysia’s Child Act (Amendment) 2016, Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, and Criminal Procedure Code. The analysis shows that Indonesia has more explicitly integrated the right to restitution into its juvenile criminal justice system, so that financial recovery for victims forms part of the operative judgment and is supported by clear enforcement mechanisms. By contrast, the Malaysian legal system is characterised by severe penal sanctions against perpetrators but has not consistently operationalised victim compensation mechanisms, as illustrated by the Zara case, in which the victim’s family did not receive financial redress through the court’s decision. These findings indicate that, although both countries have made progressive strides in child protection, Indonesia is comparatively more advanced in adopting restorative justice principles, whereas Malaysia still needs to strengthen the victim-recovery dimension to achieve a more balanced legal protection between punishment and restoration.
Co-Authors Armin Hasti Elvi Susanti Syam Fikry Fathurrahman Khairul Mannan Moch Alfatah Alti Putra Muhammad Natsir Muhammad Rafi Irwanzah Salman Sahrir Saputra, Iswandy Rani Setyawati Setyawati Zurfian Adi Asma