Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL AL ISNAD: Journal of Indonesian Hadith Studies
Ahmad Fudhaili
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Arts Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Istiṭālah Fī ʿIrḍ al-Muslim dalam Perspektif Hadis: Analisis Takhrij, Kebahasaan, dan Relevansinya di Media Sosial: Istiṭālah Fī ʿIrḍ al-Muslim in the Hadith Perspective: An Analysis of Takhrij, Linguistics, and Its Relevance to Social Media Wilda Ana Chamidah; Ahmad Fudhaili
AL ISNAD: Journal of Indonesian Hadith Studies Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): AL-ISNAD: Journal of Indonesian Hadith Studies
Publisher : Institut Daarul Qur'an Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51875/alisnad.v7i1.1209

Abstract

This study aims to examine the prohibition of degrading others’ honor in the perspective of hadith, focusing on the narration “inna min arbā al-ribā al-istīṭālata fī ʿirḍ al-muslim bi ghayri ḥaqqin.” This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach, including hadith authentication (takhrij), linguistic analysis of key terms, and examination of classical hadith commentaries. The findings reveal that violating a person’s honor (ʿirḍ) is considered a major sin with a high degree of prohibition, as it involves تجاوز (exceeding limits) in exposing or exaggerating others’ faults. However, Islam does not entirely prohibit criticism; rather, it regulates it through strict ethical boundaries. In certain circumstances, mentioning others’ shortcomings is permissible when it serves a legitimate Sharīʿah-based purpose, such as reporting injustice, seeking legal advice, preventing wrongdoing, offering sincere counsel, and providing necessary warnings or identification. The practice of the Prophet SAW demonstrates that criticism can be delivered objectively, proportionally, and for the sake of public benefit without degrading individual dignity. Therefore, this study emphasizes that Islamic communication ethics require a balance between preserving honor and conveying truth, particularly in the context of freedom of expression in the modern era.
THE RELEVANCE OF THE HADITH ON THE ANGELS' CURSE UPON A WIFE WHO REFUSES HER HUSBAND'S INVITATION IN THE CONTEXT OF MARITAL RAPE Qurota Ayunin Nissa; Ahmad Fudhaili
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 15 No 3 (2026): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i3.9193

Abstract

The hadith concerning the angels' curse upon a wife who refuses her husband's invitation has often been interpreted literally as imposing an absolute obligation on wives to fulfill their husbands' sexual demands. Such an interpretation may lead to the justification of marital rape, namely forced sexual intercourse within marriage without the spouse's consent. This study aims to examine the authenticity of the hadith, analyze its meaning, and explain its relevance to the phenomenon of marital rape. This research employs a library research method using a thematic (maudhu'i) hadith approach. The analysis includes takhrīj al-ḥadīth, sanad and matn criticism, interpretation based on classical hadith commentaries and scholarly opinions, and contextual analysis in relation to marital rape. The findings reveal that the hadith is ṣaḥīḥ in terms of sanad, as it fulfills the criteria of an authentic hadith through a continuous chain of transmission, trustworthy narrators, and the absence of shudhūdh and 'illah. Although the matn does not contradict the Qur'an or other relevant hadiths, its interpretation requires a contextual approach to avoid misogynistic implications. The angels' curse applies only to a wife's refusal without legitimate excuse ('udhr shar'i), rather than to every form of refusal. Therefore, the hadith cannot be used to justify marital rape but should instead be understood as an ethical guideline for fostering marital relations based on mu'āsharah bi al-ma'rūf, balanced rights and responsibilities, and the objectives of Islamic law in establishing a just, harmonious, and compassionate family. This study contributes a contextual interpretation of the hadith that prevents its misuse as a justification for sexual violence within marriage.
Co-Authors Qurota Ayunin Nissa Wilda Ana Chamidah