Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reformulation of the Law on Pharmacy Practices on Drug Dispensing by Independent Doctors' Practices, Reviewed from Their Purposes, Effectiveness and Legal Harmonization Adib Gunawan; Nandang Sambas; Sri Ratna Suminar
INFLUENCE: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): INFLUENCE: International Journal of Science Review
Publisher : Global Writing Academica Researching and Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/influencejournal.v8i1.327

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze pharmaceutical practice regulations on drug dispensing by independent practicing physicians and reformulate pharmaceutical practice regulations on drug dispensing by independent practicing physicians in terms of legal benefits. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach. Data were obtained through literature and empirical studies, analyzed qualitatively descriptively. The results showed that 390 doctors in Bandung City performed drug dispensing. Research in Denpasar City and Bandar Lampung also showed a relatively high rate of drug dispensing by independent practicing physicians. The reason for doctors dispensing is to make it easier for patients, the local government through DPMPTSP which is mandated by law to issue practice permits for health workers, does not allow pharmacists to create SIPs in independent medical practices, but on the other hand, as per Law No. 17 of 2023, BPJS Regulation No. Law No. 1 of 2014 also categorizes independent physician practices as health facilities, where capitation funds include medication costs. The physician discovered/alleged that a non-pharmacist pharmacy was providing non-prescription medications that should have been prescribed. Pharmacists should be permitted to create a SIP for independent physician practices. Regional regulations (through the DPMPTSP) that prohibit pharmacists from creating SIPs for independent physician practices should be reformulated to allow them.
Public Trust Crisis in the Judicial System: An Institutional and Implementative Analysis Girly Farsyadiva Althaira Nurahim; Nandang Sambas
Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): February-May
Publisher : Inovasi Pratama Internasional. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/jsh.v4i3.2011

Abstract

Public trust is the primary foundation for the sustainability of the judicial legal system in a democratic rule-of-law state. A judicial system trusted by the public not only functions as a mechanism for dispute resolution and law enforcement but also serves as a source of state legitimacy in ensuring justice, legal certainty, and the protection of human rights. However, in recent decades, the judicial legal system in various countries, including Indonesia, has faced an increasingly pronounced crisis of public trust. This crisis is reflected in negative public perceptions regarding judicial independence, the integrity of law enforcement officials, and the quality of court decisions, which are considered not yet fully reflective of substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the institutional and implementative factors that contribute to the crisis of public trust in the judicial legal system. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, through an examination of legal norms, doctrines, and contemporary scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the public trust crisis stems from weak institutional integrity, low transparency and accountability, and the gap between legal norms and judicial practice. Therefore, strengthening institutional reform and improving the implementation of law enforcement are essential prerequisites for restoring public trust in the judicial legal sys