Muhamad Jamal
INISNU Temanggung, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analysis of Abu Hanifah’s Opinion on the Sale of Sacrificial Animal Skins Muhamad Jamal; Andi Susanto; Mohammed Hafiz Ali Wafa
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 2 No. 1 June 2024: Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v2i1.609

Abstract

This study aims to examine the views of Islamic jurists regarding the ruling on selling the hide of sacrificial animals and to analyze Abu Hanifah’s opinion in relation to the practice of selling sacrificial animal hides in Lowungu Village, Bejen District, Temanggung Regency. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method, and data were collected through direct interviews with informants involved in the implementation of the sacrificial slaughter. The findings reveal two principal views in Islamic jurisprudence concerning the sale of sacrificial animal hides. Some scholars such as Abu Hanifah, Atho', al-Awza‘i, Ahmad, Ishaq, Abu Thaur, and one opinion within the Shafi‘i school permit the sale of the hide of sacrificial animals, provided that the proceeds are distributed to the beneficiaries (mustahik) of the sacrifice. The Hanafi school also allows the hide and internal parts of the sacrificial animal to be exchanged for items that bring greater benefit to the recipients. In contrast, scholars from the Maliki, Hanbali, and Shafi‘i schools, including Imam Nawawi, hold that selling the hide of sacrificial animals is not permissible. Meanwhile, the sacrificial committee in Lowungu Village sells the hides due to practical considerations, such as the absence of community members capable of processing them, which may lead to neglect, damage, or waste. The proceeds from the sale are used to support the operational needs of the sacrificial activities, including purchasing plastic bags, committee consumption, and allocating a portion for the mosque’s funds.
Divorce Mediation Based on Maqashid Syari’ah Muhamad Jamal; Ahmad Ashif; Syed Iftikhar Ali Gilani
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 December 2024: Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v2i2.618

Abstract

Divorce has become a significant social and legal issue in Indonesia, affecting not only couples but also children and extended families. This study explores the role of judges in increasing the success rate of divorce mediation at the Temanggung Religious Court in 2022–2023, using the framework of Maqashid Syari’ah as a guiding principle. The research employs a qualitative approach with data collected through interviews, observation, and document analysis. Findings reveal that judges employ strategies that integrate religious, familial, and social considerations, emphasizing sincerity, the caucus method, and recalling positive marital experiences to facilitate reconciliation. While mediation cannot always restore the marital relationship, it effectively protects the five essential objectives of Maqashid Syari’ah: religion, life, intellect, progeny, and wealth, ensuring that the parties separate amicably and without lingering resentment. This study demonstrates that applying Maqashid Syari’ah in divorce mediation contributes to more ethical, fair, and socially responsible outcomes, offering a model for improving dispute resolution in Islamic family law.
Analysis of the Inheritance Rights of Adopted Children with Disabilities Muhamad Jamal; Ali Mustofa; Nashih Muhammad
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 June 2025: Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v3i1.626

Abstract

This study examines the inheritance rights of adopted children with disabilities from the perspective of maqashid shari’ah, using a case study in Prampelan Hamlet, Adipuro Village, Kaliangkrik District, Magelang Regency. In Islamic law, adopted children lack a blood relationship (nasab) with their adoptive parents and are therefore not automatically entitled to inherit. However, in the research area, adopted children—particularly those who are the only dependents and have disabilities—are often treated as biological children, including in inheritance matters. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, with data collected through observation, interviews, and document analysis. The findings indicate that inheritance practices for adopted children with disabilities are primarily motivated by compassion and social responsibility rather than strict legal norms. Although these practices do not fully conform to formal Islamic inheritance law, they reflect the objectives of maqashid shari’ah, especially in the principles of hifz al-nafs (protection of life) and hifz al-mal (protection of wealth), providing social protection for vulnerable groups. The study recommends enhancing public understanding of Islamic inheritance law and utilizing Islamic legal mechanisms such as wasiat wajibah (mandatory bequests), hibah (gifts), and waqf (endowment) to ensure justice and legal protection for adopted children with disabilities.