Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora
Tika Roesvita Pramudya
Universitas Jambi
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penyalahgunaan Wewenang yang Dilakukan oleh Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Tika Roesvita Pramudya; Elly Sudarti; Herry Liyus
Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v12i2.5110

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the forms of abuse of authority committed by Commitment-Making Officials (PPK) in government procurement of goods and services, as well as their criminal liability for corruption offenses. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results show that government procurement is one of the sectors most vulnerable to corruption. Abuse of authority by PPK may occur during project planning, procurement system selection, tender processes, the exercise of official authority, and budget management and disbursement. Common forms of misconduct include pre-arranged project allocations to certain vendors before budget approval, document manipulation, improper preparation of the Owner’s Estimate (HPS), price mark-ups, bribery, manipulation of tender winner selection, and falsification of bidding and project handover documents. Regarding criminal liability, a PPK may be held criminally responsible when their actions cause losses to state finances. Criminal responsibility is based on the existence of an unlawful act (*actus reus*) and a guilty mind (*mens rea*), whether committed intentionally or through negligence. Therefore, abuse of authority that results in financial losses to the state may serve as a basis for criminal prosecution under anti-corruption laws.
Co-Authors Elly Sudarti Herry Liyus