Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Novum : Jurnal Hukum Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Eny Sulistyowati
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Awareness Among Small and Medium-Sized Food Business Owners Producing Melinjo Crackers Regarding the Possession of a Busines Identification Number (NIB) in Blitar Regency Hana Safitri; Eny Sulistyowati
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Novum: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v13i1.79226

Abstract

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) contribute significantly to national economic development, particularly in strengthening the real sector and creating employment opportunities. Each year, the number of MSMEs continues to increase, including those in the food sector, which is rapidly growing across various regions. However, this growth is not accompanied by adequate legal awareness, as evidenced by the fact that many MSME actors in Blitar Regency still do not possess a Business Identification Number (NIB). In fact, ownership of an NIB is a legal obligation for MSMEs in accordance with Government Regulation No. 7 of 2021 concerning the Facilitation, Protection, and Empowerment of Cooperatives and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises. This study aims to analyze the legal awareness of MSME actors engaged in melinjo chip snack food processing regarding NIB ownership in Blitar Regency. The research employed an empirical juridical method. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and were analyzed using a qualitative approach. The findings indicate that the legal awareness of these MSME actors is influenced by age, educational background, and social environment.
Reconstructing Indonesia’s Trademark Registration System through the Lens of General Principles of Good Governance to Realize Substantive Justice Muh. Ali Masnun; Dicky Eko Prasetio; Mohd Badrol Awang; Eny Sulistyowati
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Various Issues on Law Reform in Indonesia and Beyond
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v5i3.7547

Abstract

The constitutive or first-to-use system in trademark registration in Indonesia actually creates problems, particularly in failing to meet substantive justice aspects in trademark registration. This is because the constitutive or first-to-use system only provides protection for registered trademarks. This research aims to analyze and reconstruct a trademark registration system that accommodates the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB). This study provides a novel perspective by integrating the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) with Indonesia's trademark registration system, offering a unique approach to enhance substantive justice in trademark law. The research highlights the need for reform in the Indonesian trademark registration process, which can guide policymakers and legal practitioners in improving the accuracy and fairness of trademark protection, thereby reducing disputes and enhancing the protection of intellectual property rights. This research is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. The research results confirm that the "first to file" system in trademark registration in Indonesia has undermined substantive justice because it only provides legal protection when a trademark has been registered. The urgency to make AUPB a guideline in the trademark registration process is oriented so that the DJKI trademark registration process can prioritize aspects of accuracy and prudence. Reconstructing a trademark registration system model that embodies substantive justice can be done by not applying the constitutive system absolutely but rather relatively by accommodating developments in trademark registration practices. This application needs to be combined with the general principles of good governance to create a fair and effective system in protecting trademark rights and realizing substantive justice.
Co-Authors Dicky Eko Prasetio Hana Safitri Mohd Badrol Awang Muh. Ali Masnun