Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Human Ecology and Adaptive Governance in Vulnerable Mangrove Ecosystems: Global Trends and Implications for Indonesia Riesti Triyanti; Tri Retnaningsih Soeprobowati; Sri Sumiyati; Nur Arifatul Ulya
Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan Vol 21, No 1 (2026): JUNI 2026
Publisher : Balai Besar Riset Sosial Eonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15578/jsekp.v21i1.19965

Abstract

Mangrove  ecosystems  are  vital  for  coastal  socio-ecological  resilience,  yet  governance  outcomes  often  remain weak  due  to  institutional  fragmentation  and  escalating  climate  risks.  This  study  combines  a  PRISMA  2020 systematic review with bibliometric mapping (VOSviewer) of 520 Scopus-indexed publications (2000–2025) to trace global research evolution and derive Indonesia-relevant insights. Publication output accelerated sharply after 2018, peaking at >60 documents in 2024, and research production is concentrated in high-income countries (e.g., the United States ~18.6%), while Indonesia contributes only ~9.7% despite hosting the world’s largest mangrove extent. Keyword mapping identifies three dominant clusters—ecological foundations, human ecology and  governance,  and  environmental  dynamics—with  recent  trends  shifting  toward  climate–governance  and resilience themes. The key gap is that governance and resilience discourse rarely translates into an integrated institutional design linking multi-level coordination, community adaptive capacity, and long-term financing; the novelty of this study is the Dynamic Adaptive Institutional Alignment Framework that explicitly integrates these components to inform Indonesia-oriented governance reform. Findings support moving beyond restoration targets toward adaptive, learning-based, and financially durable governance architectures. The study contributes theoretically by operationalizing adaptive governance within mangrove socio-ecological systems and offers policy guidance for strengthening climate-responsive and inclusive coastal governance under conditions of increasing uncertainty. 
The physiological and ecological characteristics of some phytoremediation plants for wastewater treatment: a review Sri Sumiyati; Anik Sarminingsih; Budi Warsito
International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences Vol 15, No 2: June 2026
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijaas.v15.i2.pp705-717

Abstract

Phytoremediation has emerged as an effective method for mitigating heavy metal contamination in waterways. This study synthesizes literature to assess the physiological and ecological characteristics enhancing the efficiency of five plant species traditionally recognized for their phytoremediation potential: Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum), Phragmites australis, Typha spp., Pistia stratiotes, and Eichhornia crassipes. A systematic review methodology was utilized, focusing on data from Proquest, EBSCO, and Scopus, prioritizing studies based on pollutant absorption capacities, publication quality, and recency. Key parameters examined include the identification of plant species, growth conditions, pollutant absorption efficiency, ecological roles, and physiological characteristics. Phragmites australis is noted for its nutrient uptake and sediment stabilization, while Eichhornia crassipes demonstrates high heavy metal absorption and rapid growth. Pistia stratiotes effectively removes heavy metals and enhances water quality, and Typha spp. aids in nutrient removal while providing habitat. Napier grass contributes to biomass production and soil stabilization. The integration of these species into wastewater treatment systems not only improves water quality but also fosters sustainability and ecological health. This study emphasizes the potential utility of these plants in environmental management initiatives, highlighting the necessity for careful monitoring to mitigate associated ecological risks.