Maya Savira
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Immunomodulatory Effects of Probiotics on Th17-Mediated Immune Responses in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Rindi Rosalina Fadly; Usman Pato; Maya Savira
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i6.1615

Abstract

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with increasing evidence supporting the role of the gut-skin axis in its pathogenesis. Recent studies suggest that probiotic supplementation may modulate Th17-mediated immune responses and improve clinical outcomes in psoriasis. Methods: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases (through February 2025). Randomised controlled trials evaluating probiotic supplementation in adult patients with psoriasis were included. The primary outcome was change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. Secondary outcomes included inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP, IL-17) and immunological markers (Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, IL-10, TGF-β). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2), and evidence quality was evaluated using GRADE methodology. Results: Five randomised controlled trials encompassing 268 participants (132 intervention, 136 control) were analysed. The pooled effect size for clinical outcomes (PASI) showed significant improvement favouring probiotic supplementation (Hedges' g = −0.8165; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.6487 to −0.0483; p = 0.048; I² = 92.45%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, with the Alshihmani 2025 pilot study demonstrating markedly larger effects on immunological markers (Hedges' g = −5.6963). Subgroup analysis revealed single-strain probiotics (pooled Hedges' g = −0.3487) had smaller effect sizes than multi-strain formulations (pooled Hedges' g = −3.6740). Publication bias assessment via funnel plot and Egger's regression showed no statistically significant asymmetry (p = 0.087). Conclusion: Probiotic supplementation demonstrated statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes and immunological markers in psoriasis. However, substantial heterogeneity and reliance on small trials limit certainty. The mechanistic evidence supporting gut-skin axis modulation warrants further investigation in adequately powered, long-term randomised controlled trials with standardised outcome measures and strain-specific analysis.
Adjunctive Vaginal Probiotic Therapy for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Latency Period, Maternal Infection, and Neonatal Morbidity Vani Ardiani; Donel S; Maya Savira; Zulmaeta
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1484

Abstract

Background: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) significantly drives preterm birth rates and consequent neonatal morbidity and mortality. While standard antibiotic therapy aims to prolong pregnancy latency, it concurrently disrupts the protective vaginal microbiota. Adjunctive vaginal probiotics have been investigated as a means to restore beneficial flora, potentially mitigating ascending infection and improving perinatal outcomes. This study systematically synthesized the current randomized trial evidence regarding this adjunctive therapeutic strategy. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched (2014–October 2025) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjunctive vaginal probiotics plus antibiotics versus antibiotics (alone or with placebo) in singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM between 24+0 and 34+0 weeks’ gestation. Primary outcomes included the latency period (days) and maternal chorioamnionitis or infectious morbidity. Key secondary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal mortality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, calculating Mean Differences (MD) or Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Results: Three RCTs, encompassing 330 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Significant methodological limitations, including high risk of bias and critical baseline confounding by gestational age in the largest trial, were identified across the included studies. A sensitivity analysis addressing high heterogeneity (I²=98%) for latency (excluding one retrospective study; n=290) indicated a modest but statistically significant prolongation associated with probiotics (MD 2.98 days; 95% CI 1.80–4.16; p<0.0001; I²=0%). Probiotic use was linked to a significantly lower risk of maternal infection (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24–0.77; p=0.005; I²=0%; n=270). Statistically significant reductions were also observed for NICU admission (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.46–0.75; p<0.0001; I²=55%; n=330) and neonatal mortality (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.18–0.81; p=0.01; I²=0%; n=270), although these estimates are likely inflated due to baseline confounding. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests adjunctive vaginal probiotics may offer benefits in PPROM management by modestly prolonging latency and significantly reducing maternal infectious morbidity. While substantial reductions in NICU admission and neonatal mortality were observed, these findings must be interpreted with extreme caution due to the limited quantity and low quality of the primary evidence, particularly the high risk of bias and confounding. Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn, and routine clinical adoption is not supported by current evidence. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are imperative.
Immunomodulatory Effects of Probiotics on Th17-Mediated Immune Responses in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Rindi Rosalina Fadly; Usman Pato; Maya Savira
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i6.1615

Abstract

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with increasing evidence supporting the role of the gut-skin axis in its pathogenesis. Recent studies suggest that probiotic supplementation may modulate Th17-mediated immune responses and improve clinical outcomes in psoriasis. Methods: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases (through February 2025). Randomised controlled trials evaluating probiotic supplementation in adult patients with psoriasis were included. The primary outcome was change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. Secondary outcomes included inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP, IL-17) and immunological markers (Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, IL-10, TGF-β). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2), and evidence quality was evaluated using GRADE methodology. Results: Five randomised controlled trials encompassing 268 participants (132 intervention, 136 control) were analysed. The pooled effect size for clinical outcomes (PASI) showed significant improvement favouring probiotic supplementation (Hedges' g = −0.8165; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.6487 to −0.0483; p = 0.048; I² = 92.45%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, with the Alshihmani 2025 pilot study demonstrating markedly larger effects on immunological markers (Hedges' g = −5.6963). Subgroup analysis revealed single-strain probiotics (pooled Hedges' g = −0.3487) had smaller effect sizes than multi-strain formulations (pooled Hedges' g = −3.6740). Publication bias assessment via funnel plot and Egger's regression showed no statistically significant asymmetry (p = 0.087). Conclusion: Probiotic supplementation demonstrated statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes and immunological markers in psoriasis. However, substantial heterogeneity and reliance on small trials limit certainty. The mechanistic evidence supporting gut-skin axis modulation warrants further investigation in adequately powered, long-term randomised controlled trials with standardised outcome measures and strain-specific analysis.